Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25561387›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2015

Animal models to assess the abuse liability of tobacco products: effects of smokeless tobacco extracts on intracranial self-stimulation.

Andrew C Harris, Laura Tally, Clare E Schmidt, Peter Muelken, Irina Stepanov, Subhrakanti Saha, Rachel Isaksson Vogel, Mark G LeSage

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Acute effects of snus in never-tobacco users: a pilot study.The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2018
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Intake of vitamin BPublic health nutrition · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of Sex Differences in the Elasticity of Demand for Nicotine and Food in Rats.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Consortium on Methods Evaluating Tobacco: Research Tools to Inform US Food and Drug Administration Regulation of Snus.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Animal Research on Nicotine Reduction: Current Evidence and Research Gaps.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew C HarrisMinneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Electronic address: harr0547@umn.edu.
Laura TallyMinneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Clare E SchmidtMinneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Peter MuelkenMinneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Irina StepanovMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Subhrakanti SahaMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Rachel Isaksson VogelMasonic Cancer Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Core, University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Mark G LeSageMinneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Orthopaedic Research Foundation · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Douglas Yee · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
Tobacco Constituent and Biomarker Assessment CoreU19CA157345 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HATSUKAMI, DOROTHY K, SHIELDS, PETER G. · 2012 to 2016
$13.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS U19 CA157345NCI NIH HHS U19-CA157345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreclinical models are needed to inform regulation of tobacco products by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Typically, animal models of tobacco addiction involve exposure to nicotine alone or nicotine combined with isolated tobacco constituents (e.g. minor alkaloids). The goal of this study was to develop a model using extracts derived from tobacco products that contain a range of tobacco constituents to more closely model product exposure in humans.

methodsThis study compared the addiction-related effects of nicotine alone and nicotine dose-equivalent concentrations of aqueous smokeless tobacco extracts on intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) in rats. Extracts were prepared from Kodiak Wintergreen, a conventional product, or Camel Snus, a potential "modified risk tobacco product". Binding affinities of nicotine alone and extracts at various nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subtypes were also compared.

resultsKodiak and Camel Snus extracts contained levels of minor alkaloids within the range of those shown to enhance nicotine's behavioral effects when studied in isolation. Nonetheless, acute injection of both extracts produced reinforcement-enhancing (ICSS threshold-decreasing) effects similar to those of nicotine alone at low to moderate nicotine doses, as well as similar reinforcement-attenuating/aversive (ICSS threshold-increasing) effects at high nicotine doses. Extracts and nicotine alone also had similar binding affinity at all nAChRs studied.

conclusionsRelative nicotine content is the primary pharmacological determinant of the abuse liability of Kodiak and Camel Snus as measured using ICSS. These models may be useful to compare the relative abuse liability of other tobacco products and to model FDA-mandated changes in product performance standards.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalSelf StimulationTobacco, SmokelessTobacco Use DisorderAlkaloidsAnimalsBehavior, AddictiveElectric StimulationHumansInjections, IntraventricularMaleNicotineRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReinforcement, PsychologyAlkaloidsNicotineExtractIntracranial self-stimulationNicotineNon-nicotine tobacco constituentsPolicySmokeless tobacco

Identifiers

PMID25561387
PMCPMC4337227
OpenAlexW2071795608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.