Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25561337›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

A phase 2, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of three dosing regimens of isavuconazole compared with fluconazole in patients with uncomplicated esophageal candidiasis.

J Viljoen, N Azie, A-H Schmitt-Hoffmann, M Ghannoum

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Isavuconazonium Sulfate Use in Multi-Modal Management of Invasive Mucormycosis in Four Pediatric Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Patients.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2021
    Article
  7. In vitro activity of isavuconazole against clinically isolated yeasts from Chile.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A Review of the Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Isavuconazole.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2018
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Role of isavuconazole in the treatment of invasive fungal infections.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J ViljoenLife Knysna Private Hospital, Knysna, South Africa.
N AzieAstellas Scientific and Medical Affairs, Inc., Northbrook, Illinois, USA.
A-H Schmitt-HoffmannBasilea Pharmaceutica International, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
M GhannoumCase Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, USA mag3@case.edu.
Astellas Pharma (United States) · USBasilea Pharmaceutica (Switzerland) · CHUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophageal candidiasis is a frequent cause of morbidity in immunocompromised patients. Isavuconazole is a novel, broad-spectrum antifungal developed for the treatment of opportunistic fungal infections. This phase 2 trial compared the efficacy and safety of three oral dosing regimens of isavuconazole with an oral fluconazole regimen in the primary treatment of uncomplicated esophageal candidiasis. The isavuconazole regimens were as follows: 200 mg on day 1 and then 50 mg once daily (arm A), 400 mg on day 1 and then 400 mg once-weekly (arm B), and 400 mg on day 1 and then 100 mg once daily (arm C). Patients in arm D received fluconazole at 200 mg on day 1 and then 100 mg once daily. The minimum treatment duration was 14 days. The primary endpoint was the rate of endoscopically confirmed clinical response at end of therapy. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Efficacy was evaluated in 153 of 160 enrolled patients. Overall, 146 (95.4%) achieved endoscopically confirmed clinical success. Each of the isavuconazole regimens was shown to be not inferior to fluconazole, i.e., arm A versus D, -0.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] -10.0 to 9.4), arm B versus D, 3.5% (95% CI, -5.6 to 12.7), and arm C versus D, -0.2% (95% CI, -9.8 to 9.4). The frequency of adverse events was similar in arm A (n = 22; 55%), arm B (n = 18; 45%), and arm D (n = 22; 58%), but higher in arm C (n = 29; 71%). In summary, efficacy and safety of once-daily and once-weekly isavuconazole were comparable with once-daily fluconazole in the primary treatment of uncomplicated esophageal candidiasis.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAntifungal AgentsCandidiasisDouble-Blind MethodEsophageal DiseasesFemaleFluconazoleHumansMaleNitrilesPyridinesTriazolesAntifungal AgentsFluconazoleisavuconazoleNitrilesPyridinesTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID25561337
PMCPMC4325824
OpenAlexW2152082520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.