Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25561275›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2015

Intravenous immunoglobulin in neurology--mode of action and clinical efficacy.

Jan D Lünemann, Falk Nimmerjahn, Marinos C Dalakas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
14.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 301 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Immunoglobulin for myasthenia gravis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. n-Hexane-Toxic Neuropathy Presenting with Cauda Equina Inflammation.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Immunotherapy for autoimmune encephalitis.Cell death discovery · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Jan D LünemannInstitute of Experimental Immunology, Department of Neuroinflammation, University of Zürich, Winterthurer Strasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland.
Falk NimmerjahnDepartment of Biology, Institute of Genetics, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erwin-Rommelstrasse 3, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Marinos C DalakasNeuroimmunology Unit, University of Athens Medical School, Mikras Asias 75, Athens 115 27, Greece.
Athens Medical Center · GRFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg)-a preparation of polyclonal serum IgG pooled from thousands of blood donors-has been used for nearly three decades, and is proving to be an efficient anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory treatment for a growing number of neurological diseases. Evidence from controlled clinical trials has established IVIg as a first-line therapy for Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and multifocal motor neuropathy. IVIg is also an effective rescue therapy in some patients with worsening myasthenia gravis, and is beneficial as a second-line therapy for dermatomyositis and stiff-person syndrome. IVIg has been tested in some neurodegenerative disorders, but a controlled study in Alzheimer disease yielded disappointing results. Despite its widespread use and therapeutic success, the mechanisms of action of IVIg are poorly understood. Several hypotheses, based on the function of either the variable or constant IgG fragments, have been proposed to explain IVIg's immunomodulatory activity. This Review highlights emerging data on the mechanisms of action of IVIg related to its anti-inflammatory activity, especially that involving the cellular Fcγ receptors and Fc glycosylation. We also summarize recent trials in neurological diseases, discuss potential biomarkers of efficacy, offer practical guidelines on administration, and provide a rationale for experimental trials in neuroinflammatory disorders.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersClinical Trials as TopicDisease Models, AnimalHumansImmunoglobulins, IntravenousMiceNervous System DiseasesNeurologyTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersImmunoglobulins, Intravenous

Identifiers

PMID25561275
OpenAlexW1862461292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.