Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25561248›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2015

Repositioning for treating pressure ulcers.

Zena E H Moore, Seamus Cowman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02736838 (Peripheral Perfusion and Oxygenation in Areas of Risk of Skin Integrity Impairment Exposed to Pressure Patterns. A Phase I Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
29.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02736838 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Peripheral Perfusion and Oxygenation in Areas of Risk of Skin Integrity Impairment Exposed to Pressure Patterns. A Phase I Trial (POTER-DIC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MalagaRan2016 to 2020Enrolled20ConditionsPressure UlcerArmstcpO2, Laser Doppler
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Organisation of health services for preventing and treating pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Support surfaces for treating pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Topical phenytoin for treating pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Predicting Who Receives Nonpharmacologic Pain Interventions in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Noninvasive staging of pressure ulcers using photoacoustic imaging.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zena E H MooreSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Seamus Cowman
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPressure, from lying or sitting on a particular part of the body results in reduced oxygen and nutrient supply, impaired drainage of waste products and damage to cells. If a patient with an existing pressure ulcer continues to lie or bear weight on the affected area, the tissues become depleted of blood flow and there is no oxygen or nutrient supply to the wound, and no removal of waste products from the wound, all of which are necessary for healing. Patients who cannot reposition themselves require assistance. International best practice advocates the use of repositioning as an integral component of a pressure ulcer management strategy. This review has been conducted to clarify the role of repositioning in the management of patients with pressure ulcers.

objectivesTo assess the effects of repositioning patients on the healing rates of pressure ulcers. SEARCH

methodsFor this third update we searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 28 August 2014); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 7); Ovid MEDLINE (2013 to August Week 3 2014); Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations 29 August, 2014); Ovid EMBASE (2012 to 29 August, 2014); and EBSCO CINAHL (2012 to 27 August 2014). SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing repositioning with no repositioning, or RCTs comparing different repositioning techniques, or RCTs comparing different repositioning frequencies for the review. Controlled clinical trials (CCTs) were only to be considered in the absence of RCTs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed titles and, where available, abstracts of the studies identified by the search strategy for their eligibility. We obtained full versions of potentially relevant studies and two authors independently screened these against the inclusion criteria. MAIN

resultsWe identified no studies that met the inclusion criteria. AUTHORS'

conclusionsDespite the widespread use of repositioning as a component of the management plan for individuals with existing pressure ulcers, no randomised trials exist that assess the effects of repositioning patients on the healing rates of pressure ulcers. Therefore, we cannot conclude whether repositioning patients improves the healing rates of pressure ulcers. The effect of repositioning on pressure ulcer healing needs to be evaluated.

Indexed as

Moving and Lifting PatientsPatient PositioningWound HealingHumansPressure Ulcer

Identifiers

PMID25561248
PMCPMC7389249
OpenAlexW2171194643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.