Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25561041›Full record

ArticleJAMA pediatrics2015

Effect of expanding medicaid for parents on children's health insurance coverage: lessons from the Oregon experiment.

Jennifer E DeVoe, Miguel Marino, Heather Angier, Jean P O'Malley, Courtney Crawford, Christine Nelson, Carrie J Tillotson, Steffani R Bailey, Charles Gallia, Rachel Gold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Association of state Medicaid expansion policies with pediatric liver transplant outcomes.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2024
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jennifer E DeVoeDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland2OCHIN, Inc, Portland, Oregon.
Miguel MarinoDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Heather AngierDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Jean P O'MalleyDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Courtney CrawfordDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Christine NelsonOCHIN, Inc, Portland, Oregon.
Carrie J TillotsonDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Steffani R BaileyDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Charles GalliaOffice of Health Analytics, Oregon Health Authority, Portland.
Rachel GoldOCHIN, Inc, Portland, Oregon5Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.

Funding

How do Changes in Families' Health Insurance Affect Children's Healthcare?R01HS018569 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVOE, JENNIFER E · 2010 to 2013
$2.0M
AHRQ HHS 1 R01 HS018569AHRQ HHS R01 HS018569
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceIn the United States, health insurance is not universal. Observational studies show an association between uninsured parents and children. This association persisted even after expansions in child-only public health insurance. Oregon's randomized Medicaid expansion for adults, known as the Oregon Experiment, created a rare opportunity to assess causality between parent and child coverage.

objectiveTo estimate the effect on a child's health insurance coverage status when (1) a parent randomly gains access to health insurance and (2) a parent obtains coverage. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsOregon Experiment randomized natural experiment assessing the results of Oregon's 2008 Medicaid expansion. We used generalized estimating equation models to examine the longitudinal effect of a parent randomly selected to apply for Medicaid on their child's Medicaid or Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) coverage (intent-to-treat analyses). We used per-protocol analyses to understand the impact on children's coverage when a parent was randomly selected to apply for and obtained Medicaid. Participants included 14409 children aged 2 to 18 years whose parents participated in the Oregon Experiment. EXPOSURES: For intent-to-treat analyses, the date a parent was selected to apply for Medicaid was considered the date the child was exposed to the intervention. In per-protocol analyses, exposure was defined as whether a selected parent obtained Medicaid. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Children's Medicaid or CHIP coverage, assessed monthly and in 6-month intervals relative to their parent's selection date.

resultsIn the immediate period after selection, children whose parents were selected to apply significantly increased from 3830 (61.4%) to 4152 (66.6%) compared with a nonsignificant change from 5049 (61.8%) to 5044 (61.7%) for children whose parents were not selected to apply. Children whose parents were randomly selected to apply for Medicaid had 18% higher odds of being covered in the first 6 months after parent's selection compared with children whose parents were not selected (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=1.18; 95% CI, 1.10-1.27). The effect remained significant during months 7 to 12 (AOR=1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19); months 13 to 18 showed a positive but not significant effect (AOR=1.07; 95% CI, 0.99-1.14). Children whose parents were selected and obtained coverage had more than double the odds of having coverage compared with children whose parents were not selected and did not gain coverage (AOR=2.37; 95% CI, 2.14-2.64). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Children's odds of having Medicaid or CHIP coverage increased when their parents were randomly selected to apply for Medicaid. Children whose parents were selected and subsequently obtained coverage benefited most. This study demonstrates a causal link between parents' access to Medicaid coverage and their children's coverage.

Indexed as

ParentsAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolChild WelfareFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthMaleMedicaidOregonRandom AllocationSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID25561041
PMCPMC4918752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.