ArticleJAMA pediatrics2015
Effect of expanding medicaid for parents on children's health insurance coverage: lessons from the Oregon experiment.
Article in JAMA pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experiences of Mothers Following the Medicaid Postpartum Extension.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Medical insurance coverage and its associated factors among children in urban and rural Chongqing, China.International health · 2026Article
- Association of Medicaid expansion with children's insurance coverage and healthcare utilization.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Navigating Healthcare and Public Benefits in NC: Perspectives of Undocumented Latina Women with U.S.-Born Infants.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2025Article
- Health care access, utilization, and quality for children in English versus Spanish-speaking households.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- Linking household members and defining relational networks using routine health data.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2025Review
- A Scoping Review to Identify Community- and Societal-Level Strategies Evaluated from 2013 to 2023 for Their Potential Impact on Child Well-Being in the United States.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Association of state Medicaid expansion policies with pediatric liver transplant outcomes.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2024Article
- Observational
- Out of the Woodwork: Enrollment Spillovers in the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment.American economic journal. Economic policy · 2022Article
- Brief Report: Medicaid Expansion and Growth in the Workforce for Autism Spectrum Disorder.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2022Article
- Narrowing Insurance Disparities Among Children and Adolescents With Cancer Following the Affordable Care Act.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2022Article
- A Qualitative Study of Two Oregon Family Medicine Clinics to Explain Parent and Child Healthcare Initiation and Engagement.Journal of patient experience · 2022Article
- Changes in Health Care-Related Financial Burden for US Families With Children Associated With the Affordable Care Act.JAMA pediatrics · 2020Article
- Association between Medicaid expansion, dental coverage policies for adults, and children's receipt of preventive dental services.Health services research · 2020Article
- Association of maternal characteristics with latino youth health insurance disparities in the United States: a generalized structural equation modeling approach.BMC public health · 2020Article
- Pediatric outpatient utilization by differing Medicaid payment models in the United States.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Association of Medicaid Expansion With Insurance Coverage Among Children With Cancer.JAMA pediatrics · 2020Article
- Medicaid and CHIP Child Health Beneficiary Incentives: Program Landscape and Stakeholder Insights.Pediatrics · 2019Review
- Adult-Oriented Health Reform and Children's Insurance and Access to Care: Evidence from Massachusetts Health Reform.Maternal and child health journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceIn the United States, health insurance is not universal. Observational studies show an association between uninsured parents and children. This association persisted even after expansions in child-only public health insurance. Oregon's randomized Medicaid expansion for adults, known as the Oregon Experiment, created a rare opportunity to assess causality between parent and child coverage.
objectiveTo estimate the effect on a child's health insurance coverage status when (1) a parent randomly gains access to health insurance and (2) a parent obtains coverage. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsOregon Experiment randomized natural experiment assessing the results of Oregon's 2008 Medicaid expansion. We used generalized estimating equation models to examine the longitudinal effect of a parent randomly selected to apply for Medicaid on their child's Medicaid or Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) coverage (intent-to-treat analyses). We used per-protocol analyses to understand the impact on children's coverage when a parent was randomly selected to apply for and obtained Medicaid. Participants included 14409 children aged 2 to 18 years whose parents participated in the Oregon Experiment. EXPOSURES: For intent-to-treat analyses, the date a parent was selected to apply for Medicaid was considered the date the child was exposed to the intervention. In per-protocol analyses, exposure was defined as whether a selected parent obtained Medicaid. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Children's Medicaid or CHIP coverage, assessed monthly and in 6-month intervals relative to their parent's selection date.
resultsIn the immediate period after selection, children whose parents were selected to apply significantly increased from 3830 (61.4%) to 4152 (66.6%) compared with a nonsignificant change from 5049 (61.8%) to 5044 (61.7%) for children whose parents were not selected to apply. Children whose parents were randomly selected to apply for Medicaid had 18% higher odds of being covered in the first 6 months after parent's selection compared with children whose parents were not selected (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=1.18; 95% CI, 1.10-1.27). The effect remained significant during months 7 to 12 (AOR=1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19); months 13 to 18 showed a positive but not significant effect (AOR=1.07; 95% CI, 0.99-1.14). Children whose parents were selected and obtained coverage had more than double the odds of having coverage compared with children whose parents were not selected and did not gain coverage (AOR=2.37; 95% CI, 2.14-2.64). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Children's odds of having Medicaid or CHIP coverage increased when their parents were randomly selected to apply for Medicaid. Children whose parents were selected and subsequently obtained coverage benefited most. This study demonstrates a causal link between parents' access to Medicaid coverage and their children's coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.