Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25560971›Full record

ArticleeLife2015

Quantitative system drift compensates for altered maternal inputs to the gap gene network of the scuttle fly Megaselia abdita.

Karl R Wotton, Eva Jiménez-Guri, Anton Crombach, Hilde Janssens, Anna Alcaine-Colet, Steffen Lemke, Urs Schmidt-Ott, Johannes Jaeger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Breaking anterior-posterior symmetry in the moth flybioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Deriving a genetic regulatory network from an optimization principle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Understanding developmental system drift.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. A synthetic synthesis to explore animal evolution and development.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. System drift and speciation.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022
    Article
  14. Time and space in segmentation.Interface focus · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Karl R WottonEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, CRG Systems Biology Research Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain.
Eva Jiménez-GuriEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, CRG Systems Biology Research Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain.
Anton CrombachEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, CRG Systems Biology Research Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain.
Hilde JanssensEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, CRG Systems Biology Research Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna Alcaine-ColetEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, CRG Systems Biology Research Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain.
Steffen LemkeDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.
Urs Schmidt-OttDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.
Johannes JaegerEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, CRG Systems Biology Research Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat Pompeu Fabra · ESUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The segmentation gene network in insects can produce equivalent phenotypic outputs despite differences in upstream regulatory inputs between species. We investigate the mechanistic basis of this phenomenon through a systems-level analysis of the gap gene network in the scuttle fly Megaselia abdita (Phoridae). It combines quantification of gene expression at high spatio-temporal resolution with systematic knock-downs by RNA interference (RNAi). Initiation and dynamics of gap gene expression differ markedly between M. abdita and Drosophila melanogaster, while the output of the system converges to equivalent patterns at the end of the blastoderm stage. Although the qualitative structure of the gap gene network is conserved, there are differences in the strength of regulatory interactions between species. We term such network rewiring 'quantitative system drift'. It provides a mechanistic explanation for the developmental hourglass model in the dipteran lineage. Quantitative system drift is likely to be a widespread mechanism for developmental evolution.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsBody PatterningDatabases, GeneticDipteraDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianEvolution, MolecularFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenes, InsectRNA InterferenceRNA, MessengerDrosophila ProteinsRNA, Messengerdata quantificationdevelopmental biologydevelopmental system driftD. melanogasterevolutionary biologyevolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo)gap gene networkgenomicsMegaselia abditaRNA interferencestem cells

Identifiers

PMID25560971
PMCPMC4337606
OpenAlexW2055810074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.