Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25560632›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer2015

Melanoma cells influence the differentiation pattern of human epidermal keratinocytes.

Ondřej Kodet, Lukáš Lacina, Eliška Krejčí, Barbora Dvořánková, Miloš Grim, Jiří Štork, Daniela Kodetová, Čestmír Vlček, Jana Šáchová, Michal Kolář and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
18.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 267 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Impact ofCells · 2024
    Article
  6. Contribution of Keratinocytes in Skin Cancer Initiation and Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Melanoma stimulates the proteolytic activity of HaCaT keratinocytes.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The Plasma Membrane CaCancers · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ondřej Kodet
Lukáš Lacina
Eliška Krejčí
Barbora Dvořánková
Miloš Grim
Jiří Štork
Daniela Kodetová
Čestmír Vlček
Jana Šáchová
Michal Kolář
Hynek Strnad1st Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Anatomy, Charles University in Prague, U Nemocnice 3, CZ-12800 Prague, Czech Republic. strnad@img.cas.cz.
Karel Smetana
Charles University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Molecular Genetics · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNodular melanoma is one of the most life threatening tumors with still poor therapeutic outcome. Similarly to other tumors, permissive microenvironment is essential for melanoma progression. Features of this microenvironment are arising from molecular crosstalk between the melanoma cells (MC) and the surrounding cell populations in the context of skin tissue. Here, we study the effect of melanoma cells on human primary keratinocytes (HPK). Presence of MC is as an important modulator of the tumor microenvironment and we compare it to the effect of nonmalignant lowly differentiated cells also originating from neural crest (NCSC).

methodsComparative morphometrical and immunohistochemical analysis of epidermis surrounding nodular melanoma (n = 100) was performed. Data were compared to results of transcriptome profiling of in vitro models, in which HPK were co-cultured with MC, normal human melanocytes, and NCSC, respectively. Differentially expressed candidate genes were verified by RT-qPCR. Biological activity of candidate proteins was assessed on cultured HPK.

resultsEpidermis surrounding nodular melanoma exhibits hyperplastic features in 90% of cases. This hyperplastic region exhibits aberrant suprabasal expression of keratin 14 accompanied by loss of keratin 10. We observe that MC and NCSC are able to increase expression of keratins 8, 14, 19, and vimentin in the co-cultured HPK. This in vitro finding partially correlates with pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia observed in melanoma biopsies. We provide evidence of FGF-2, CXCL-1, IL-8, and VEGF-A participation in the activity of melanoma cells on keratinocytes.

conclusionWe conclude that the MC are able to influence locally the differentiation pattern of keratinocytes in vivo as well as in vitro. This interaction further highlights the role of intercellular interactions in melanoma. The reciprocal role of activated keratinocytes on biology of melanoma cells shall be verified in the future.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationCell DifferentiationEpidermal CellsAdultAgedCell Line, TumorChemokine CXCL1EpidermisFemaleFibroblast Growth Factor 2Gene Expression ProfilingHumansInterleukin-8Keratin-10Keratin-14KeratinocytesChemokine CXCL1Fibroblast Growth Factor 2Interleukin-8Keratin-10Keratin-14S100 ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID25560632
PMCPMC4325966
OpenAlexW2158920969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.