Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25560432›Full record

ReviewPlant molecular biology2015

Current status of viral expression systems in plants and perspectives for oral vaccines development.

Jorge A Salazar-González, Bernardo Bañuelos-Hernández, Sergio Rosales-Mendoza

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Plant molecular biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Citrus sudden death-associated virus as a new expression vector for rapidBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Transient plant production ofBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jorge A Salazar-GonzálezLaboratorio de Biofarmacéuticos Recombinantes, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Av. Dr. Manuel Nava 6, 78210, San Luis Potosí, SLP, Mexico.
Bernardo Bañuelos-Hernández
Sergio Rosales-Mendoza
Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last 25 years, the technology to produce recombinant vaccines in plant cells has evolved from modest proofs of the concept to viable technologies adopted by some companies due to significant improvements in the field. Viral-based expression strategies have importantly contributed to this success owing to high yields, short production time (which is in most cases free of tissue culture steps), and the implementation of confined processes for production under GMPs. Herein the distinct expression systems based on viral elements are analyzed. This review also presents the outlook on how these technologies have been successfully applied to the development of plant-based vaccines, some of them being in advanced stages of development. Perspectives on how viral expression systems could allow for the development of innovative oral vaccines constituted by minimally-processed plant biomass are discussed.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsBiotechnologyGenetic VectorsHumansPlants, Genetically ModifiedPlant VirusesVaccines, SyntheticVaccines, Virus-Like ParticleViral VaccinesVirusesVaccines, SyntheticVaccines, Virus-Like ParticleViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25560432
OpenAlexW2085844474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.