Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25559739›Full record

ReviewVirulence2015

Vaccines in the treatment of invasive candidiasis.

Xiao-juan Wang, Xue Sui, Lan Yan, Yan Wang, Yong-bing Cao, Yuan-ying Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virulence, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. RethinkingVaccines · 2026
    Review
  2. The pathogenicity and future treatment strategies ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. B-Cell Epitope Mapping from Eight Antigens ofInternational journal of peptide research and therapeutics · 2022
    Article
  8. Vaccines against candidiasis: Status, challenges and emerging opportunity.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiao-juan Wanga Center for New Drug Research; School of Pharmacy ; Second Military Medical University ; 325 Guohe Road; Shanghai , P.R. China.
Xue Sui
Lan Yan
Yan Wang
Yong-bing Cao
Yuan-ying Jiang
Second Military Medical University · CNShenyang Pharmaceutical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candida albicans is the most common cause of hematogenously disseminated candidiasis, and this disease is particularly prevalent in immunocompromised patients. The mortality of invasive candidiasis remains 40% to 50% even with the proper treatment with current antifungal drugs. Recently, with the better understanding of host-fungus interactions, notable progress has been made in antifungal vaccine research. Most antifungal vaccines exert protection by inducing either (or both) B-cell and T-cell responses. Here we summarize the current available information on C. albicans vaccines, highlight the obstacles that researchers identified, and offer several suggestions.

Indexed as

Fungal VaccinesAnimalsCandida albicansCandidiasis, InvasiveHumansImmunization, PassiveVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, ConjugateVaccines, SubunitFungal VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, ConjugateVaccines, SubunitCandida albicansimmune responseinvasive candidiasisvaccinevirulence

Identifiers

PMID25559739
PMCPMC4601158
OpenAlexW2065957851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.