Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25559708›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2015

Adipose tissue derived stem cells: in vitro and in vivo analysis of a standard and three commercially available cell-assisted lipotransfer techniques.

Rossana Domenis, Lara Lazzaro, Sarah Calabrese, Damiano Mangoni, Annarita Gallelli, Evgenia Bourkoula, Ivana Manini, Natascha Bergamin, Barbara Toffoletto, Carlo A Beltrami and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rossana DomenisDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, P.le Kolbe 4, 33100, Udine, Italy. rossana.domenis@uniud.it.
Lara LazzaroClinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of Udine, University of Udine, P.le Kolbe 4, 33100, Udine, Italy. laralazzaro@hotmail.com.
Sarah CalabreseClinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of Udine, University of Udine, P.le Kolbe 4, 33100, Udine, Italy. sarah2012@hotmail.com.
Damiano MangoniDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, P.le Kolbe 4, 33100, Udine, Italy. damianomng@gmail.com.
Annarita GallelliDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, P.le Kolbe 4, 33100, Udine, Italy. byoteck@libero.it.
Evgenia BourkoulaDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, P.le Kolbe 4, 33100, Udine, Italy. jenny_bourkoula@hotmail.com.
Ivana ManiniDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, P.le Kolbe 4, 33100, Udine, Italy. ivana.manini@tiscali.it.
Natascha BergaminAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Udine, P.le S. Maria della Misericordia 15, 33100, Udine, Italy. nataschab@libero.it.
Barbara ToffolettoDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, P.le Kolbe 4, 33100, Udine, Italy. t_barbara2001@yahoo.it.
Carlo A BeltramiAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Udine, P.le S. Maria della Misericordia 15, 33100, Udine, Italy. carloalberto.beltrami@uniud.it.
Antonio P BeltramiDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, P.le Kolbe 4, 33100, Udine, Italy. antonio.beltrami@uniud.it.
Daniela CesselliDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, P.le Kolbe 4, 33100, Udine, Italy. daniela.cesselli@uniud.it.
Pier Camillo ParodiClinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of Udine, University of Udine, P.le Kolbe 4, 33100, Udine, Italy. piercamillo.parodi@uniud.it.
University of Udine · ITOspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAutologous fat grafting is commonly used to correct soft-tissue contour deformities. However, results are impaired by a variable and unpredictable resorption rate. Autologous adipose-derived stromal cells in combination with lipoinjection (cell-assisted lipotransfer) seem to favor a long-term persistence of fat grafts, thus fostering the development of devices to be used in the operating room at the point of care, to isolate the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and produce SVF-enhanced fat grafts with safe and standardized protocols. Focusing on patients undergoing breast reconstruction by lipostructure, we analyzed a standard technique, a modification of the Coleman's procedure, and three different commercially available devices (Lipokit, Cytori, Fastem), in terms of 1) ability to enrich fat grafts in stem cells and 2) clinical outcome at 6 and 12 months.

methodsTo evaluate the ability to enrich stem cells, we compared, for each patient (n=20), the standard lipoaspirate with the respective stem cell-enriched one, analyzing yield, immunophenotype and colony-forming capacity of the SVF cells as well as immunophenotype, clonogenicity and multipotency of the obtained adipose stem cells (ASCs). Regarding the clinical outcome, we compared, by ultrasonography imaging, changes at 6 and 12 months in the subcutaneous thickness of patients treated with stem-cell enriched (n=14) and standard lipoaspirates (n=16).

resultsBoth methods relying on the enzymatic isolation of primitive cells led to significant increase in the frequency, in the fat grafts, of SVF cells as well as of clonogenic and multipotent ASCs, while the enrichment was less prominent for the device based on the mechanical isolation of the SVF. From a clinical point of view, patients treated with SVF-enhanced fat grafts demonstrated, at six months, a significant superior gain of thickness of both the central and superior-medial quadrants with respect to patients treated with standard lipotransfer. In the median-median quadrant the effect was still persistent at 12 months, confirming an advantage of lipotransfer technique in enriching improving long-term fat grafts.

conclusionsThis comparative study, based on reproducible biological and clinical parameters and endpoints, showed an advantage of lipotransfer technique in enriching fat grafts in stem cells and in favoring, clinically, long-term fat grafts.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueAdultAgedAntigens, SurfaceBreastCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedColony-Forming Units AssayFemaleFlow CytometryHumansImmunophenotypingLipectomyMastectomyMiddle AgedStem CellsAntigens, Surface

Identifiers

PMID25559708
PMCPMC4417272
OpenAlexW2107910498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.