ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2015
Examining perceived cancer risk among patients with neurofibromatosis type 1.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retrospective Analysis of T2-Hyperintense Lesions in Children With Neurofibromatosis Type 1.Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2026Article
- Malignant transformation in a sciatic plexiform neurofibroma in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 - imaging features that aid diagnosis.Journal of radiology case reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is a genetic disorder in which patients are at significantly increased risk for developing malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) and malignant gliomas (brain cancer). We sought to develop a measure for assessing perceived risk of developing MPNST and brain cancer among patients with NF1 and to examine patients' perceived risk of developing these cancers. We assessed 112 NF1 patients' perceived risk of developing MPNST and brain cancer using an 8-item scale we developed that yielded two subscales in a principal component analysis (PCA). Linear regression models examined factors associated with perceived risk of malignancy. 33.9 % and 47.3 % of patients disagreed that having NF1 placed them at increased risk for MPNST and brain cancer, respectively. The PCA of the perceived risk items yielded a 2-factor solution with an MPNST and a brain subscale (total scale α = 0.90). Level of anxiety was the primary factor associated with perceived risk for both cancers. A significant proportion of NF1 patients underestimate their risk of developing MPNST and brain cancer. Perceived risk was associated with emotional distress, in particular anxiety. Clinicians should actively communicate with NF1 patients about their elevated cancer risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.