ArticleBMC systems biology2014
Discovery of small protein complexes from PPI networks with size-specific supervised weighting.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficient and accurate identification of protein complexes from protein-protein interaction networks based on the clustering coefficient.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Detecting complexes from edge-weighted PPI networks via genes expression analysis.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
- Improving prediction of heterodimeric protein complexes using combination with pairwise kernel.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- CPredictor3.0: detecting protein complexes from PPI networks with expression data and functional annotations.BMC systems biology · 2017Article
- RocSampler: regularizing overlapping protein complexes in protein-protein interaction networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- A multi-network clustering method for detecting protein complexes from multiple heterogeneous networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- An effective approach to detecting both small and large complexes from protein-protein interaction networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Protein complex detection based on partially shared multi-view clustering.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Using contrast patterns between true complexes and random subgraphs in PPI networks to predict unknown protein complexes.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Prediction of problematic complexes from PPI networks: sparse, embedded, and small complexes.Biology direct · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prediction of small complexes (consisting of two or three distinct proteins) is an important and challenging subtask in protein complex prediction from protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks. The prediction of small complexes is especially susceptible to noise (missing or spurious interactions) in the PPI network, while smaller groups of proteins are likelier to take on topological characteristics of real complexes by chance. We propose a two-stage approach, SSS and Extract, for discovering small complexes. First, the PPI network is weighted by size-specific supervised weighting (SSS), which integrates heterogeneous data and their topological features with an overall topological isolatedness feature. SSS uses a naive-Bayes maximum-likelihood model to weight the edges with two posterior probabilities: that of being in a small complex, and of being in a large complex. The second stage, Extract, analyzes the SSS-weighted network to extract putative small complexes and scores them by cohesiveness-weighted density, which incorporates both small-co-complex and large-co-complex weights of edges within and surrounding the complexes. We test our approach on the prediction of yeast and human small complexes, and demonstrate that our approach attains higher precision and recall than some popular complex prediction algorithms. Furthermore, our approach generates a greater number of novel predictions with higher quality in terms of functional coherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.