ArticleClinical cardiology2015
Applying the ideal cardiovascular health metrics to couples: a cross-sectional study in primary care.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Couples-based health behavior change interventions: A relationship science perspective on the unique opportunities and challenges to improve dyadic health.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2024Article
- Cohort profile update: The Cork and Kerry Diabetes and Heart Disease Study.HRB open research · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular Health Metrics of 87,160 Couples: Analysis of a Nationwide Epidemiological Database.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2021Article
- Cardiovascular disease risk factor profile of male Gaelic Athletic Association sports referees.Irish journal of medical science · 2018Article
- Ideal cardiovascular health among Ghanaian populations in three European countries and rural and urban Ghana: the RODAM study.Internal and emergency medicine · 2018Article
- Ideal Cardiovascular Health Metrics in Couples: A Community-Based Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018Article
- Longitudinal patterns of potentially inappropriate prescribing in early old-aged people.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Article
- The Effects of Free-Living Physical Activity on Mortality After Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosis.Clinical cardiology · 2016Article
- Assessment of American Heart Association's Ideal Cardiovascular Health Metrics Among Employees of a Large Healthcare Organization: The Baptist Health South Florida Employee Study.Clinical cardiology · 2015Article
- Associations between self-rated physical Health and relationship satisfaction in couples with children.Health psychology openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is little research on overall cardiovascular (CV) health among couples. Our aim was to examine concordance levels for CV health among couples, using the American Heart Association ideal health metrics, and to investigate if the CV health of an individual is associated with that of his or her partner. HYPOTHESIS: There is a positive association between the overall cardiovascular health of an individual and that of his/her partner.
methodsThe Mitchelstown Study is a community-based cohort study of middle-aged Irish adults. Potential couples were identified as 2 study participants living at the same address. This list was cross-referenced with self-reported marital status and telephone number in the electronic patient record. Information on CV health metrics (smoking, body mass index, physical activity, diet, blood pressure, cholesterol, and glucose) was collected using standardized methods. Participants were categorized as ideal, intermediate, or poor for each of the metrics and for overall CV health. The 0- to 14-point CV health metrics score was compared within couples using linear regression.
resultsOf 2047 participants, 191 potential couples were identified. We excluded 6 sibling pairs, 1 divorced couple, and 3 couples who self-reported being single. The analysis includes 181 couples. There were significant associations between partners for smoking, diet, blood pressure, cholesterol, and glucose (P < 0.05). No couple had ideal CV health (ie, both partners with 7 ideal metrics). Most couples (n = 127, 69%) were concordant for poor CV health. There was a significant relationship between partners for the CV health metrics score (P < 0.05).
conclusionsOur results suggest an individual's CV health is associated with that of his or her partner. Therefore, prevention strategies targeting couples and families may be appropriate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.