GuidelineJournal of gastroenterology2015
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps.
Guideline in Journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 193 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of shared decision-making in guidelines about colorectal cancer screening.European journal of cancer care · 2022Pooled it
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Surveillance After Colorectal Adenomatous Polypectomy.Epidemiologic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy: A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial of polyp detection.Cancer medicine · 2021Trial
- Safety and efficacy of cold snare polypectomy for pedunculated (Ip) polyps measuring less than 10 mm in diameter.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020Trial
- Article
- Reliable classification of polyps based on artificial intelligence: a development and validation study.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Preoperative risk stratification for pathological upgrading in colorectal polyps using explainable machine learning: implications for screening optimization and resource allocation.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Dysplasia Grading in Colorectal Adenomas According to Current Guidelines: A Nationwide Survey Among Pathologists in Türkiye.Turk patoloji dergisi · 2026Article
- Comparative efficacy and safety of injection mucosa knife versus conventional techniques in endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal laterally spreading tumors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Impact of complete colonoscopy after ischaemic colitis onset on colorectal neoplasm detection in patients without suspected coexistence of colorectal cancer on computed tomography: a retrospective analysis.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Observational
- Reply to the letter to the editor regarding "Clinical outcome and long-term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in patients aged 75 years or older: a retrospective observational study".International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- Clinical outcome and long‑term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in patients aged 75 years or older: a retrospective observational study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Observational
- Article
- White spots around colorectal tumors are cancer-related findings and may aid endoscopic diagnosis: a prospective study in Japan.Clinical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Risk factors and prediction model for delayed bleeding after cold snare polypectomy: a retrospective study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Article
- Risk Factors for Post-Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Electrocoagulation Syndrome in Patients with Colorectal Neoplasms: A Multicenter, Large-Scale, Retrospective Cohort Study by the Honam Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease (HASID).Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Improved dual-aggregation polyp segmentation network combining a pyramid vision transformer with a fully convolutional network.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms: Risk factors for local recurrence and long-term surveillance.DEN open · 2024Article
- Impact of WeChat guidance on bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a quasi-experiment study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Through the Looking Glass: Surveillance Following Colonoscopic Polypectomy of Malignant Polyps.Cureus · 2023Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently in Japan, the morbidity of colorectal polyp has been increasing. As a result, a large number of cases of colorectal polyps that are diagnosed and treated using colonoscopy has now increased, and clinical guidelines are needed for endoscopic management and surveillance after treatment.
methodsThree committees [the professional committee for making clinical questions (CQs) and statements by Japanese specialists, the expert panelist committee for rating statements by the modified Delphi method, and the evaluating committee by moderators] were organized. Ten specialists for colorectal polyp management extracted the specific clinical statements from articles published between 1983 and September 2011 obtained from PubMed and a secondary database, and developed the CQs and statements. Basically, statements were made according to the GRADE system. The expert panel individually rated the clinical statements using a modified Delphi approach, in which a clinical statement receiving a median score greater than seven on a nine-point scale from the panel was regarded as valid.
resultsThe professional committee created 91CQs and statements for the current concept and diagnosis/treatment of various colorectal polyps including epidemiology, screening, pathophysiology, definition and classification, diagnosis, treatment/management, practical treatment, complications and surveillance after treatment, and other colorectal lesions (submucosal tumors, nonneoplastic polyps, polyposis, hereditary tumors, ulcerative colitis-associated tumor/carcinoma).
conclusionsAfter evaluation by the moderators, evidence-based clinical guidelines for management of colorectal polyps have been proposed for 2014.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.