Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25558828›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2014

A synthetic lethal screen identifies the Vitamin D receptor as a novel gemcitabine sensitizer in pancreatic cancer cells.

V Bhattacharjee, Y Zhou, T J Yen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Pancreatic cancer: from bench to bedside.Annals of translational medicine · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

V Bhattacharjeea Fox Chase Cancer Center ; Institute for Cancer Research ; Philadelphia , PA USA.
Y Zhou
T J Yen
Philadelphia University · USFox Chase Cancer Center · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Margaret von Mehren · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
Characterization of Drug Survival by Pancreatic Cancer Cells in vitro and in vivoR21CA182651 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI YEN, TIMOTHY · 2014 to 2015
$427k
Chemosensitization of Pancreatic Cancer Cells by Curcumin and Vitamin D ReceptorR21CA169706 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI YEN, TIMOTHY · 2013 to 2014
$420k
NCI NIH HHS CA06927NCI NIH HHS CA169706NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS R21 CA169706NCI NIH HHS R21 CA182651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overcoming chemoresistance of pancreatic cancer (PCa) cells should significantly extend patient survival. The current treatment modalities rely on a variety of DNA damaging agents including gemcitabine, FOLFIRINOX, and Abraxane that activate cell cycle checkpoints, which allows cells to survive these drug treaments. Indeed, these treatment regimens have only extended patient survival by a few months. The complex microenvironment of PCa tumors has been shown to complicate drug delivery thus decreasing the sensitivity of PCa tumors to chemotherapy. In this study, a genome-wide siRNA library was used to conduct a synthetic lethal screen of Panc1 cells that was treated with gemcitabine. A sublethal dose (50 nM) of the drug was used to model situations of limiting drug availability to PCa tumors in vivo. Twenty-seven validated sensitizer genes were identified from the screen including the Vitamin D receptor (VDR). Gemcitabine sensitivity was shown to be VDR dependent in multiple PCa cell lines in clonogenic survival assays. Sensitization was not achieved through checkpoint override but rather through disrupting DNA repair. VDR knockdown disrupted the cells' ability to form phospho-γH2AX and Rad51 foci in response to gemcitabine treatment. Disruption of Rad51 foci formation, which compromises homologous recombination, was consistent with increased sensitivity of PCa cells to the PARP inhibitor Rucaparib. Thus inhibition of VDR in PCa cells provides a new way to enhance the efficacy of genotoxic drugs.

Indexed as

Antimetabolites, AntineoplasticCell Cycle CheckpointsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalDeoxycytidineDNA DamageGemcitabineGene LibraryHistonesHomologous RecombinationHumansIndolesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsPancreatic NeoplasmsRad51 RecombinaseReceptors, CalcitriolAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDeoxycytidineGemcitabineH2AX protein, humanHistonesIndolesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsRad51 RecombinaseReceptors, CalcitriolRNA, Small InterferingrucaparibTP53BP1 protein, humanTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1BXPC3chemosensitizationDNA DSB, DNA Double-strand breakDNA repairgemcitabineHDAC inhibitorsIF, Immunofluorescencep300Panc1pancreatic cancerPARP inhibitorPCa, Pancreatic cancerRad51 focisiRNA screenstalled replication forkVDRVDR, Vitamin D receptorVitamin D receptor

Identifiers

PMID25558828
PMCPMC4615005
OpenAlexW1967000460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.