Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25558824›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2015

All in the Family: Barriers and Motivators to the Use of Cancer Family History Questionnaires and the Impact on Attendance Rates.

Susan Randall Armel, Jeanna McCuaig, Nicole Gojska, Rochelle Demsky, Manjula Maganti, Joan Murphy, Barry Rosen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Susan Randall ArmelThe Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Clinic, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave., Room M-704, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada. susan.randall@uhn.on.ca.
Jeanna McCuaigThe Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Clinic, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave., Room M-704, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
Nicole GojskaThe Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Clinic, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave., Room M-704, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
Rochelle DemskyThe Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Clinic, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave., Room M-704, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
Manjula MagantiDepartment of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Joan MurphyThe Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Clinic, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave., Room M-704, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
Barry RosenThe Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Clinic, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave., Room M-704, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data has demonstrated that family history questionnaires (FHQs) are an invaluable tool for assessing familial cancer risk and triaging patients for genetic counseling services. Despite their benefits, return rates of mailed FHQs from newly referred patients remain low, suggesting potential barriers to their use. To investigate this, a total of 461 participants, 239 who completed a FHQ (responders) and 222 who did not (non-responders), were surveyed at a subsequent appointment regarding potential barriers and motivators to using the FHQ. With respective rates of 51 and 56 %, there was no significant difference in the proportion of responders and non-responders who reported difficulty in completing the FHQ; however, for both groups factors related to family dynamics (large family size, lack of contact with relatives, and lack of knowledge of family history) were reported as major variables confounding completion of the FHQ. Responders were also significantly more likely to have a personal diagnosis of cancer (p = 0.02) and to report that their physician had discussed the reason for the appointment with them (p = 0.01). Overall, 19 % of non-responders returned their FHQ after being mailed an appointment letter and 67 % attended their scheduled genetic counseling appointment. These findings demonstrate that difficulty completing the FHQ is not inherent to its design but due to difficulty accessing one's family history, and that mailed appointment letters are a highly successful way to increase attendance rates in the non-responder population. Furthermore, these results demonstrate the important role that referring physicians play in the utilization of genetic counseling services.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorFemaleGenetic CounselingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMedical History TakingMotivationNeoplasmsReferral and ConsultationRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesFamily history questionnaireGenetic counselingHereditary breast and ovarian cancerService utilization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.