ArticleAmerican health & drug benefits2014
Cardiovascular events and safety outcomes associated with azithromycin therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in American health & drug benefits, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibiotics for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Incidence and treatment of arrhythmias secondary to coronavirus infection in humans: A systematic review.European journal of clinical investigation · 2021Pooled it
- Non-surgical periodontal therapy supplemented with systemically administered azithromycin: a systematic review of RCTs.Clinical oral investigations · 2015Pooled it
- Azithromycin versus azithromycin-pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine-pyrimethamine for the treatment of ocular toxoplasmosis: a retrospective comparative case-series.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Gastroparesis in Parkinson's disease: Diagnostic and clinical implications for optimizing pharmacological treatment.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Review
- Travel-related gastrointestinal diseases: Assessment and management.Public health challenges · 2022Review
- Azithromycin in patients with COVID-19: Friend or foe?Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2021Article
- Can endolysosomal deacidification and inhibition of autophagy prevent severe COVID-19?Life sciences · 2020Review
- Comparison of Cardiac Events Associated With Azithromycin vs Amoxicillin.JAMA network open · 2020Observational
- Azithromycin in COVID-19 Patients: Pharmacological Mechanism, Clinical Evidence and Prescribing Guidelines.Drug safety · 2020Review
- An algorithm for managing QT prolongation in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients treated with either chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine in conjunction with azithromycin: Possible benefits of intravenous lidocaine.HeartRhythm case reports · 2020Article
- Parkinson's Disease and Current Treatments for Its Gastrointestinal Neurogastromotility Effects.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2018Review
- Risk Evaluation of Azithromycin-Induced QT Prolongation in Real-World Practice.BioMed research international · 2018Article
- Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of travelers' diarrhea: a graded expert panel report.Journal of travel medicine · 2017Review
- An eye for azithromycin: review of the literature.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAzithromycin has been used for many years for the treatment of patients with various types of bacterial infections, as well as for the secondary prevention of coronary events. There is a growing concern, however, that azithromycin may be associated with an increased cardiovascular (CV) risk and may lead to CV-related death in high-risk patients.
objectiveThis systematic review of randomized controlled trials was conducted to analyze and describe the CV risk and safety outcomes associated with azithromycin therapy.
methodsA meta-analysis was conducted based on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from 1990 through September 2013. Specific medical search terms in the English language included "azithromycin," "macrolide," "antibiotic," "cardiovascular diseases," and "cardiovascular events" and were used to identify relevant randomized clinical trials that assessed the risk for CV events in patients receiving azithromycin therapy or placebo. The randomized clinical trials that were selected included patients who received azithromycin or placebo for the treatment of infection or for the secondary prevention of coronary events. Major health outcome measures included mortality, hospitalization, and coronary intervention. Meta-analyses were performed using a random effects model.
resultsA total of 12 randomized clinical trials included 15,588 patients. Patients were divided into 2 groups, either to azithromycin therapy or to placebo. Compared with patients who had not received azithromycin, patients who had received azithromycin had an overall risk ratio (RR) of death of 0.877 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.752-1.024; P = .097). No heterogeneity was observed (I(2) = 0%). Similarly, no differences were found in the pooled RRs for hospitalization or for clinical intervention for CV events (RR, 1.005; 95% CI, 0.922-1.094; P = .915; I(2) = 0% and RR, 0.999; 95% CI, 0.896-1.125; P = .984; I(2) = 0%, respectively).
conclusionNo increased risks for mortality or for CV events associated with azithromycin therapy compared with placebo were found among patients included in the 12 randomized clinical trials reviewed in this analysis.
Identifiers
25558301PMC4280524W2125901283What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.