Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25558131›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of yoga2015

Suryanamaskar: An equivalent approach towards management of physical fitness in obese females.

Komal A Jakhotia, Apurv P Shimpi, Savita A Rairikar, Priyanka Mhendale, Renuka Hatekar, Ashok Shyam, Parag K Sancheti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of yoga, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Body Loading during an Intensive Yoga Exercise Routine and a Cycle Ergometer Test.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Komal A JakhotiaDepartment of Community Physiotherapy, Sancheti Healthcare Academy, Sancheti Institute College of Physiotherapy, Maharashtra, India.
Apurv P ShimpiDepartment of Community Physiotherapy, Sancheti Healthcare Academy, Sancheti Institute College of Physiotherapy, Maharashtra, India.
Savita A RairikarDepartment of Community Physiotherapy, Sancheti Healthcare Academy, Sancheti Institute College of Physiotherapy, Maharashtra, India.
Priyanka MhendaleDepartment of Community Physiotherapy, Sancheti Healthcare Academy, Sancheti Institute College of Physiotherapy, Maharashtra, India.
Renuka HatekarDepartment of Community Physiotherapy, Sancheti Healthcare Academy, Sancheti Institute College of Physiotherapy, Maharashtra, India.
Ashok ShyamDepartment of Orthopedics, Sancheti Institute of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Thube Park, Shivaji Nagar, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Parag K SanchetiDepartment of Orthopedics, Sancheti Institute of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Thube Park, Shivaji Nagar, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn India, obesity is highly prevalent in women as compared to men. As the obesity epidemic spreads, there are growing concerns about efficient obesity management.

aimsTo compare between circuit training (CT), treadmill (TM) walking and suryanamaskar (SN) training in weight management and physical fitness enhancement in obese females. SETTINGS AND DESIGNS: Comparative controlled study conducted in a community setting. MATERIALS AND

methods119 females of age between 20 and 40 years of body mass index (BMI) between 25.1 and 34.9 kg/m(2). 87 participants completed the study. Group 1: CT; group 2: TM walking; group 3: Modified SN; group 4: Control. OUTCOME MEASURES: Body composition, cardio-respiratory and muscle endurance, flexibility. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Within-group data was analyzed with the paired t-test. P =0.05. Analysis between the groups was done using one way ANOVA test. Analysis between the groups was done using ANCOVA test controlling for baseline differences only for those variables that have significant differences at baseline. For those which do not have significant difference at baseline, RMANOVA was done at end of 8 weeks.

resultsReducation in mean body weight in CT group (2.2%), TM (1.7%) and SN (1.6%), (P < 0.05), BMI in all the three groups (P < 0.01), total body fat % in the CT (5%) and SN (3.7%), (P < 0.01), metabolic age with CT (2%) and TM (2%), (P = 0.001). Improvement in muscle mass in CT (4%, P = 0.009), VO2max in CT group by 17.2%, SN (14%), TM group (8%) (P < 0.05). Upper limb Muscle endurance in CT (51.3%), SN group (51.24%) and in TM group (40%), (P = 0.05), in lower limb TM (21.2%) and SN (24.5%) (P = 0.05), flexibility in SN (12.4%, P = 0.0001).

conclusionsAll three methods were effective in weight and physical fitness management. CT and SN were more effective in improving cardio-respiratory fitness and upper limb muscle endurance while only SN was effective in improving body flexibility.

Indexed as

Body compositioncircuit trainingexercise trainingobesitysuryanamaskar

Identifiers

PMID25558131
PMCPMC4278132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.