ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2015
Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review.
Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 194 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
194 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,044 citations in OpenAlex.
- Control strategies used in lower limb exoskeletons for gait rehabilitation after brain injury: a systematic review and analysis of clinical effectiveness.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Pooled it
- A review of user needs to drive the development of lower limb prostheses.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022Pooled it
- A Review on Locomotion Mode Recognition and Prediction When Using Active Orthoses and Exoskeletons.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- EMG-driven control in lower limb prostheses: a topic-based systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022Pooled it
- Machine Learning Approaches for Activity Recognition and/or Activity Prediction in Locomotion Assistive Devices-A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Pooled it
- Wearable Ankle Robots in Post-stroke Rehabilitation of Gait: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2019Pooled it
- Randomized controlled trial of robot-assisted gait training with dorsiflexion assistance on chronic stroke patients wearing ankle-foot-orthosis.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2018Trial
- Cyberlegs X-Leg at CYBATHLON 2024: insights on the control development of an active transfemoral prosthesis.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Diff-MomentFormer: Generative Diffusion-Augmented Transformer for End-to-End Joint Moment Estimation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ultrathin Temporary Tattoo Electrodes Enable Prolonged Skin-Conformable EMG Sensing for Hip Exoskeleton Control.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Lower limb active exoskeletons, exosuits, assistive devices and specifications: a scoping review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Dynamic Modelling and Control Strategy Analysis of a Lower-Limb Exoskeleton.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The SoftFoot Pro: an anthropomorphic and adaptive soft articulated prosthetic foot.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Locomotion Decoding (Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2026Article
- Fast walking with swing extension assistance in a nominally passive semi-powered prosthetic knee.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Article
- A Single-Source Dual-Drive Flexible Knee Assistive Exoskeleton for Elderly Daily Locomotion.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Editorial: Advances in smart and adaptive prosthetic and wearable technologies.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Article
- Design and Evaluation of Stand-to-Sit and Sit-to-Stand Control Protocols for a HIP-Knee-Ankle-Foot Prosthesis with a Motorized Hip Joint.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Robotic Assistive Devices on Paretic Knee Motion in Post-Stroke Patients: An IMU-Based Pilot Study.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Design and Testing of an Emg-Controlled Semi-Active Knee Prosthesis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
134 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
: Technological advancements have led to the development of numerous wearable robotic devices for the physical assistance and restoration of human locomotion. While many challenges remain with respect to the mechanical design of such devices, it is at least equally challenging and important to develop strategies to control them in concert with the intentions of the user.This work reviews the state-of-the-art techniques for controlling portable active lower limb prosthetic and orthotic (P/O) devices in the context of locomotive activities of daily living (ADL), and considers how these can be interfaced with the user's sensory-motor control system. This review underscores the practical challenges and opportunities associated with P/O control, which can be used to accelerate future developments in this field. Furthermore, this work provides a classification scheme for the comparison of the various control strategies.As a novel contribution, a general framework for the control of portable gait-assistance devices is proposed. This framework accounts for the physical and informatic interactions between the controller, the user, the environment, and the mechanical device itself. Such a treatment of P/Os--not as independent devices, but as actors within an ecosystem--is suggested to be necessary to structure the next generation of intelligent and multifunctional controllers.Each element of the proposed framework is discussed with respect to the role that it plays in the assistance of locomotion, along with how its states can be sensed as inputs to the controller. The reviewed controllers are shown to fit within different levels of a hierarchical scheme, which loosely resembles the structure and functionality of the nominal human central nervous system (CNS). Active and passive safety mechanisms are considered to be central aspects underlying all of P/O design and control, and are shown to be critical for regulatory approval of such devices for real-world use.The works discussed herein provide evidence that, while we are getting ever closer, significant challenges still exist for the development of controllers for portable powered P/O devices that can seamlessly integrate with the user's neuromusculoskeletal system and are practical for use in locomotive ADL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.