SynthesisCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2015
Population pharmacokinetic analysis of oxaliplatin in adults and children identifies important covariates for dosing.
Synthesis in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Population pharmacokinetic analysis of fluorouracil and oxaliplatin in the absence or presence of zolbetuximab in locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2025Trial
- Evaluating Oxaliplatin Exposure in Adults with Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Development and Validation of Methods with Enhanced Bioanalytical Specificity and Clinical Applicability.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2026Article
- Oxaliplatin-associated nephrotoxicity: clinical patterns, renal pharmacokinetics, and mechanistic insights.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2026Review
- <p>Unveiling sex differences in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Current evidence and future directions (Review)</p>.International journal of oncology · 2026Review
- Sex differences in chemotherapy completion, toxicities, and survival in colon cancer: an analysis of 2201 patients from CALGB/SWOG 80702 (Alliance).Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Multi-drug pharmacotyping improves therapy prediction in pancreatic cancer organoids.Cancer cell international · 2025Article
- Determination of Oxaliplatin by a UHPLC-MS/MS Method: Application to Pharmacokinetics and Tongue Tissue Distribution Studies in Rats.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Population Pharmacokinetic Model-Based Evaluation of Intact Oxaliplatin in Rats with Acute Kidney Injury.Cancers · 2021Article
- Sex and Adverse Events of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colon Cancer: An Analysis of 34 640 Patients in the ACCENT Database.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2021Article
- Semi-Mechanism-Based Pharmacokinetic-Toxicodynamic Model of Oxaliplatin-Induced Acute and Chronic Neuropathy.Pharmaceutics · 2020Article
- Neutropenia predicts better prognosis in patients with metastatic gastric cancer on a combined epirubicin, oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil regimen.Oncotarget · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo characterize the determinants of variability for oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics including age, renal function, and hepatic function in children and adults.
methodsOxaliplatin pharmacokinetic data were combined from phase I and II clinical trials: three pediatric trials (Peds1-3) and two adult NCI organ dysfunction studies (Hepatic and Renal). A population pharmacokinetic model was developed utilizing platinum ultrafiltrate concentrations to characterize changes in oxaliplatin disposition with age and organ dysfunction along with other potential sources of oxaliplatin pharmacokinetic variability.
resultsA total of 1,508 concentrations from 186 children and adults were used in the study. The data were well described by a three-compartment model. Serum creatinine (SCR) was an independent predictor of clearance (CL) while age was an independent predictor of volume of distribution. Although age was a significant covariate on CL in the univariate analysis, age effects on CL were entirely accounted for by SCR. Gender, hepatic function, and race had no effect on CL or volume of distribution. Median CL values were 0.58 (Hepatic), 0.34 (Renal), 0.78 (Peds1), 0.74 (Peds2), and 0.81 (Peds3) (L/h/kg(0.75)). Monte Carlo simulations of the final model with 130 mg/m(2) yielded median AUC values of: 14.2 (2-6 years), 16.8 (6-12 years), 16.5 (12-18 years), and 17.3 (>18 years) (µg h/mL).
conclusionsRenal function had the greatest effect on CL with a small age effect seen on the distribution of oxaliplatin. Young pediatric patients had higher CL values than adults as a result of better renal function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.