Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25557790›Full record

ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2015

An exon variant in insulin receptor gene is associated with susceptibility to colorectal cancer in women.

Touraj Mahmoudi, Keivan Majidzadeh-A, Khatoon Karimi, Negar Karimi, Hamid Farahani, Reza Dabiri, Hossein Nobakht, Hesamodin Dolatmoradi, Maral Arkani, Mohammad Reza Zali

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Association ofArchives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Polymorphisms of microRNA target genesWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Touraj MahmoudiDepartment of Cancer, Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Velenjak, Shahid Chamran Highway, Tehran, 1985711151, Iran, mahmouditouraj@gmail.com.
Keivan Majidzadeh-A
Khatoon Karimi
Negar Karimi
Hamid Farahani
Reza Dabiri
Hossein Nobakht
Hesamodin Dolatmoradi
Maral Arkani
Mohammad Reza Zali
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRSemnan University of Medical Sciences · IRAcademic Center for Education, Culture and Research · IRQom University of Medical Science and Health Services · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the role of insulin resistance in colorectal cancer (CRC), we explored whether genetic variants in insulin (INS), insulin receptor (INSR), insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1), insulin receptor substrate 2 (IRS2), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) genes were associated with CRC risk. A total of 600 subjects, including 261 cases with CRC and 339 controls, were enrolled in this case-control study. Six polymorphisms in INS (rs689), INSR (rs1799817), IRS1 (rs1801278), IRS2 (rs1805097), IGF1 (rs5742612), and IGFBP3 (rs2854744) genes were genotyped using PCR-RFLP method. No significant difference was observed for INS, INSR, IRS1, IRS2, IGF1, and IGFBP3 genes between the cases and controls. However, the INSR rs1799817 "TT + CT" genotype and "CT" genotype compared with "CC" genotype occurred more frequently in the women with CRC than women controls (P = 0.007; OR = 1.93, 95 %CI = 1.20-3.11 and P = 0.002, OR = 2.15, 95 %CI = 1.31-3.53, respectively), and the difference remained significant after adjustment for confounding factors including age, BMI, smoking status, NSAID use, and family history of CRC (P = 0.018; OR = 1.86, 95 %CI = 1.11-3.10 and P = 0.004, OR = 2.18, 95 %CI = 1.28-3.71, respectively). In conclusion, to our knowledge, this study indicated for the first time that the INSR rs1799817 TT + CT genotype and CT genotype compared with the CC genotype had 1.86-fold and 2.18-fold increased risks for CRC among women, respectively. Furthermore, this finding is in line with previous studies which found significant associations between other variants of the INSR gene and CRC risk. Nevertheless, further studies are required to confirm our findings.

Indexed as

ExonsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic VariationGenotypeHumansInsulinInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3Insulin-Like Growth Factor IInsulin Receptor Substrate ProteinsMiddle AgedIGFBP3 protein, humanInsulinInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3Insulin-Like Growth Factor IInsulin Receptor Substrate ProteinsIRS1 protein, humanIRS2 protein, humanReceptor, Insulin

Identifiers

PMID25557790
OpenAlexW2029027083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.