SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2015
No difference in clinical outcome between patella eversion and lateral retraction in total knee arthroplasty: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparison of the clinical efficacy of patellar lateral retraction and patellar eversion in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Pooled it
- The Postoperative Effects of Patellar Eversion in Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.BioMed research international · 2022Pooled it
- Safety and Effectiveness of Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Trial
- Optimal Handling of the Patella in Tourniquet-Free Total Knee Arthroplasty: Eversion or Lateral Retraction?Orthopaedic surgery · 2020Trial
- Patellar retraction versus eversion on functional outcomes in total knee replacement: a randomized controlled study protocol.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSurgical exposure during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) requires mobilization technique of the patella. Proponents of minimally invasive TKA claim that lateral retraction, rather than eversion, of the patella may be beneficial. Many randomized controlled studies attempt to identify this issue; however, no final conclusion arrives. With this systemic review and meta-analysis, we intended to test whether patella eversion during TKA had deleterious effects.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and other internet database. We retrieved all the relevant studies designed to interpret this issue. The searching time frame was from the establishing of these databases until July 2014.
resultsSix randomized controlled trials assessing a total of 414 patients and 451 knees were included. The duration of surgery was much shorter (p = 0.003), and the length of skin incision was much longer (p < 0.00001). No significant difference was found on other measurements, including length of hospital stay, quadriceps strength, complications, straight leg raise, Visual Analogue Scale score and functional scores.
conclusionsPatella eversion could decrease the duration of the surgery; nevertheless, the length of skin incision was longer; no significant difference was found on other measurements, especially the quadriceps strength and complications which were concerned. Patella eversion and patella lateral retraction could achieve similar clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review and meta-analysis, Level I.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25557221What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.