Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25557205›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2015

Evidence for pelvic organ prolapse predisposition genes on chromosomes 10 and 17.

Kristina Allen-Brady, Lisa A Cannon-Albright, James M Farnham, Peggy A Norton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Advances in molecular mechanisms of pelvic organ prolapse (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Can pelvic floor dysfunction after vaginal birth be prevented?International urogynecology journal · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristina Allen-BradyDivision of Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT. Electronic address: kristina.allen@utah.edu.
Lisa A Cannon-AlbrightDivision of Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; Research and Development Service, George E. Wahlen Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT.
James M FarnhamDivision of Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Peggy A NortonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.

Funding

University of Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001067 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI DERE, WILLARD H., HESS, RACHEL · 2013 to 2017
$19.8M
IDENTIFICATION OF GENES PREDISPOSING TO PELVIC FLOOR DISORDERSR01HD061821 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ALBRIGHT, LISA CANNON · 2009 to 2013
$3.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001067NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe conducted a genomewide linkage analysis to identify pelvic organ prolapse (POP) predisposition genes using a resource of high-risk POP pedigrees. STUDY

designCases are defined as women who reported bothersome symptoms of POP based on standardized symptom questions (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, moderately or quite bothered), and/or received treatment for POP documented in medical records. Our complete pedigree resource contains 299 familial POP cases in 83 high-risk pedigrees. Genotype data were obtained from Illumina HumanHap550, 610Q, the Human1M-Duo, Human Omni1-Quad, or the Human Omni 2.5 platforms. A set of single nucleotide polymorphism markers common to all platforms was identified and markers in high linkage disequilibrium were removed. We performed a genomewide linkage analysis under general dominant and recessive models using a Markov chain, Monte Carlo linkage analysis method implemented in MCLINK (University of Utah) software. Because 70 individuals in 32 pedigrees were used in a previously published linkage analysis for a phenotype of POP requiring treatment/surgery, we also performed linkage only including the 225 newly recruited and genotyped cases in 61 pedigrees.

resultsLinkage analysis using our complete pedigree resource for the loosened criteria of bothersome POP showed evidence for significant genomewide linkage on chromosome 10q24-26 (recessive model, maximum heterogeneity logarithm of odds 3.4); suggestive evidence was identified on chromosomes 6 and 17, and an additional region on chromosome 10. In the subset of only the newly recruited familial POP cases, significant evidence for genomewide linkage was observed on chromosome 17q25 (recessive model, maximum heterogeneity logarithm of odds 3.3), and suggestive evidence for linkage was observed on chromosomes 10 and 11. Neither analysis duplicated the previously published linkage evidence for the POP requiring treatment/surgery phenotype observed on chromosome 9.

conclusionWhile the etiology of this common condition is unknown, this study provides evidence that loci on chromosomes 10q and 17q may contribute to POP etiology.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseChromosomes, Human, Pair 10Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17FemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansPedigreePelvic Organ Prolapsechromosome 10q24-26chromosome 17q25genetic linkage analysishigh-risk familial casespelvic organ prolapse

Identifiers

PMID25557205
PMCPMC4457667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.