Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25557141›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2015

Population pharmacokinetic model of free and total ropivacaine after transversus abdominis plane nerve block in patients undergoing liver resection.

Edouard Ollier, Fabrice Heritier, Caroline Bonnet, Sophie Hodin, Brigitte Beauchesne, Serge Molliex, Xavier Delavenne

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Weight-based dosing of ropivacaine in erector spinae blocks.Regional anesthesia and pain medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Enhanced Recovery via Peripheral Nerve Block for Open Hepatectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edouard OllierUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, F-69100, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6925-2941
Fabrice HeritierDépartement d'anesthésie Réanimation, CHU de Saint-Etienne, F-42055, Saint-Etienne, France.
Caroline BonnetDépartement d'anesthésie Réanimation, CHU de Saint-Etienne, F-42055, Saint-Etienne, France.
Sophie HodinLaboratoire de Pharmacologie Toxicologie, CHU Saint-Etienne, F-42055, Saint-Etienne, France.
Brigitte BeauchesneDépartement d'anesthésie Réanimation, CHU de Saint-Etienne, F-42055, Saint-Etienne, France.
Serge MolliexDépartement d'anesthésie Réanimation, CHU de Saint-Etienne, F-42055, Saint-Etienne, France.
Xavier DelavenneLaboratoire de Pharmacologie Toxicologie, CHU Saint-Etienne, F-42055, Saint-Etienne, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of this study was to develop a pharmacokinetic model in order to characterize the free and total ropivacaine concentrations after transversus abdominis plane block in a population of patients undergoing liver resection surgery. In particular, we evaluated the impact of the size of liver resection on ropivacaine pharmacokinetics.

methodsThis work is based on a single-centre, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Among the 39 patients included, 19 patients were randomized to the ropivacaine group. The free and total ropivacaine concentrations were measured in nine or 10 blood samples per patient. A pharmacokinetic model was built using a nonlinear mixed-effect modelling approach.

resultsThe free ropivacaine concentrations remained under the previously published toxic threshold. A one-compartment model, including protein binding site with a first-order absorption, best described the data. The protein binding site concentration was considered as a latent variable. Bodyweight, the number of resected liver segments and postoperative fibrinogen evolution were, respectively, included in the calculation of the volume of distribution, clearance and binding site production rate. The resection of three or more liver segments was associated with a 53% decrease in the free ropivacaine clearance.

conclusionsAlthough large liver resections were associated with lower free ropivacaine clearance, the ropivacaine pharmacokinetic profile remained within the safe range after this type of surgery.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmidesAnesthetics, LocalDouble-Blind MethodHumansLiverMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalNerve BlockRopivacaineAmidesAnesthetics, LocalRopivacaineliver resectionmodelpopulation pharmacokineticsprotein bindingropivacainetransversus abdominis plane block

Identifiers

PMID25557141
PMCPMC4500326
OpenAlexW2116477350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.