Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25556988›Full record

ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2015

Phase 1 trial and pharmacokinetic study of the oral platinum analog satraplatin in children and young adults with refractory solid tumors including brain tumors.

Srivandana Akshintala, Leigh Marcus, Katherine E Warren, Robert F Murphy, Tristan M Sissung, Anjali Srivastava, Wendy J Goodspeed, Anne Goodwin, Carmen C Brewer, Christopher Zalewski and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The Platin-X series: activation, targeting, and delivery.Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003) · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Srivandana AkshintalaPediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Leigh Marcus
Katherine E Warren
Robert F Murphy
Tristan M Sissung
Anjali Srivastava
Wendy J Goodspeed
Anne Goodwin
Carmen C Brewer
Christopher Zalewski
Kelly A King
AeRang Kim
William D Figg
Brigitte C Widemann
National Cancer Institute · USCenter for Cancer Research · USNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders · USNational Institutes of Health · USChildren's National · US

Funding

Clinical Analysis Of Disorders Of Hearing And BalanceZIADC000064 · NIDCD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS · PI HERTZANO, RONNA · 2009 to 2025
$25.2M
Sample Processing and Analytical Methods Development for New Anticancer AgentsZICSC006536 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI FIGG, WILLIAM DOUGLAS · 2009 to 2025
$18.1M
Using Clinical Pharmacology Principles to Develop New Anticancer TherapiesZICSC006537 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI FIGG, WILLIAM DOUGLAS · 2009 to 2025
$14.4M
Clinical PharmacogeneticsZIABC010627 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI FIGG, WILLIAM DOUGLAS · 2009 to 2025
$13.9M
Early Clinical Trials for Children with CNS TumorsZIABC011447 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WARREN, KATHERINE E · 2012 to 2019
$2.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBased on pre-clinical and clinical activity in adult refractory tumors, and absence of significant neuro-, nephro-, or oto-toxicity, we conducted a pediatric phase 1 trial to determine the toxicities, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics of satraplatin, an oral platinum analogue, in children and young adults with refractory solid tumors. PROCEDURE: Satraplatin was administered orally once daily on days 1-5 of a 28-day cycle at dose level (DL) 1 (60 mg/m(2) /dose), and DL2 (80 mg/m(2) /dose). Toxicities, responses, satraplatin pharmacokinetics, and pharmacogenomic expression of specific DNA repair genes were evaluated.

resultsNine patients received 1-15 cycles (median = 2). The MTD was exceeded at DL2 with delayed prolonged myelosuppression as dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in 2/4 patients. At DL1, 0/5 patients had DLTs. Common non-DLTs included myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicities, fatigue, headache, liver enzyme elevation, and electrolyte abnormalities. No significant neuro-, nephro-, or oto-toxicity was observed. No objective responses were observed but 2 patients experienced prolonged disease stabilization (---6-15 cycles). Satraplatin exposure (day 1 plasma ultrafiltrate area under the curve) was similar at DL1 and DL2. A strong correlation between estimated creatinine clearance and satraplatin pharmacokinetic parameters (clearance, area under the curve, and peak concentration) was observed.

conclusionsThe MTD of oral satraplatin in children with solid tumors was 60 mg/m(2) /dose daily ×5 days every 28 days, which is lower than the adult recommended dose of 80-120 mg/m(2) /dose. The toxicity profile was similar to adults and delayed myelosuppression was the DLT. No significant neuro-, nephro- or oto-toxicities were observed.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsAdministration, OralAdolescentAntineoplastic AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDNA RepairDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseOrganoplatinum CompoundsYoung AdultAntineoplastic AgentsOrganoplatinum Compoundssatraplatinpediatricphase 1 trialsatraplatinsolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID25556988
PMCPMC4339515
OpenAlexW1560067560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.