Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25556787›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2015

Glutamate receptor pores.

James E Huettner

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Structure and gating of kainate receptors.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  3. Temperature Sensitive Glutamate Gating of AMPA-subtype iGluRs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2023/24: Ion channels.British journal of pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Polyamine block of MthK potassium channels.The Journal of general physiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

James E HuettnerDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

GLUTAMATE-GATED CHANNELS IN CENTRAL/PERIPHERAL NEURONSR01NS030888 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HUETTNER, JAMES E · 1992 to 2016
$4.4M
NINDS NIH HHS NS30888NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS030888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glutamate receptors are ligand-gated ion channels that mediate fast excitatory synaptic transmission throughout the central nervous system. Functional receptors are homo- or heteromeric tetramers with each subunit contributing a re-entrant pore loop that dips into the membrane from the cytoplasmic side. The pore loops form a narrow constriction near their apex with a wide vestibule toward the cytoplasm and an aqueous central cavity facing the extracellular solution. This article focuses on the pore region, reviewing how structural differences among glutamate receptor subtypes determine their distinct functional properties.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansIon Channel GatingProtein ConformationReceptors, GlutamateReceptors, Glutamate

Identifiers

PMID25556787
PMCPMC4293053
OpenAlexW1509552674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.