ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2015
Multimodality liver registration of Open-MR and CT scans.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the suitability of automated registration and segmentation for dosimetry calculations in SIRT treatment planning.EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- PhysMorph: A biomechanical and image-guided deep learning framework for real-time multi-modal liver image registration.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Segmentation-guided multi-modal registration of liver images for dose estimation in SIRT.EJNMMI physics · 2022Article
- Improving multi-atlas cardiac structure segmentation of computed tomography angiography: A performance evaluation based on a heterogeneous dataset.Computers in biology and medicine · 2020Article
- Fully automated convolutional neural network-based affine algorithm improves liver registration and lesion co-localization on hepatobiliary phase T1-weighted MR images.European radiology experimental · 2019Article
- Joint deformable liver registration and bias field correction for MR-guided HDR brachytherapy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMultimodality registration of liver CT and MRI scans is challenging due to large initial misalignment, non-uniform MR signal intensity in the liver parenchyma, incomplete liver shapes in Open-MR scans and non-rigid deformations of the organ. An automated method was developed to register liver CT and open-MRI scans.
methodsA hybrid registration algorithm was developed which incorporates both rigid and non-rigid methods. First, large misalignment of input CT and Open-MR images was compensated by intensity-based registration. Maximum intensity projections (MIPs) of CT and MR data were registered in 2D, and the corresponding rigid transform parameters were used to align 3D images in axial, coronal and sagittal planes. Use of MIP projections compensates for intensity inhomogeneities inherent in the Open-MR data. A bounding box of MIP images defines an ROI which removes outliers and copes with incomplete MR data. Next, principal components analysis (PCA) was used to align MR and CT data datasets. The corresponding translation and rotation parameters were then used to increase the global registration accuracy. A modified TPS-RPM point-based non-rigid algorithm was used to accommodate local liver deformations. Surface points on the liver and branching points of the portal veins were input as landmarks to TPS-RPM method. Incorporating vascular branching points improves registration since tumors are usually found near vessels, so greater weight was given to branching points compared with surface points.
resultsThe automated registration algorithm was compared with both rigid and non-rigid methods. Quantitative evaluation was performed using modified Hausdorff distance and overlap measure. The mean modified Hausdorff distances of liver and tumor were decreased from 23.53 and 40.03 mm to 9.38 and 8.88 mm, respectively. The mean overlap measures of liver and tumor were increased from 39 and 0 % to 78 and 27 %, respectively. Statistical analysis of the outcomes resulted in a p value less than 5 %.
conclusionMIP-PCA-based rigid multimodality CT-MRI registration of liver scans compensates for large misalignment of input images even when the data are incomplete. A modified TPS-RPM algorithm, in which vascular points are emphasized over surface points, successfully handled local deformations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.