Trial reportPediatric blood & cancer2015
Longitudinal differences in aerobic capacity between children with sickle cell anemia and matched controls.
Trial report in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety of maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing in individuals with sickle cell disease: a systematic review.British journal of sports medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Physical Activity and Physical Fitness in Children and Adolescents Diagnosed With Sickle Cell Disease: A Scoping Review.American journal of lifestyle medicine · 2026Review
- Diastolic dysfunction is associated with exercise impairment in patients with sickle cell anemia.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2018Article
- Pediatric Exercise Testing: Value and Implications of Peak Oxygen Uptake.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- Exercise Testing of Adolescents and Young Adults With Sickle Cell Disease: Perceptual Responses and the Gas Exchange Threshold.Journal of pediatric oncology nursing : official journal of the Association of Pediatric Oncology NursesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare longitudinal trajectories of maximal aerobic capacity in children with sickle cell anemia (SCA) and matched healthy controls, and explore whether these trajectories were associated with selected physiologic variables. PROCEDURE: Children with SCA (n = 33) and healthy controls (n = 30) matched at baseline for race, sex, Tanner stage, height, and weight completed three consecutive annual fitness assessments (VO2peak ). Data were compared between the groups at each time point and within groups over time. Change in VO2peak between the two groups over time was assessed using a linear mixed model with age, sex, fat-free mass (FFM), Tanner stage, and hemoglobin (Hgb) concentration as covariates.
resultsAt baseline, children with SCA had significantly lower Hgb concentration (8.9 vs. 13.7 g/dL, P < 0.001) and relative VO2peak (24.2 vs. 27.9 ml/kg/min, P = 0.006) than healthy controls. Over time, children with SCA had smaller increases than healthy controls in VO2peak (-0.1 and +4.9 ml/kg/min, P < 0.001), Tanner stage at year 2 (15% and 66% Tanner 4, P < 0.001), and FFM (+4.0 and +6.8 kg, P = 0.02). Changes in Hgb concentration did not differ between groups (+0.03 and +0.09 g/dL, P = 1.0). After adjusting for age, sex, Tanner stage, FFM, and Hgb concentration the differences in change in VO2peak over time remained significant (P < 0.001).
conclusionChildren with SCA demonstrate lower relative VO2peak compared to healthy children and the difference increases over time. The difference in VO2peak trajectories between the two groups during puberty remains significant after adjusting for age, sex, FFM, Tanner stage, and Hgb concentration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.