Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25556165›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN2015

Assessing the Validity of Surrogate Outcomes for ESRD: A Meta-Analysis.

Min Jun, Tanvir Chowdhury Turin, Mark Woodward, Vlado Perkovic, Hiddo J Lambers Heerspink, Braden J Manns, Marcello Tonelli, Brenda R Hemmelgarn

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
31.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Combination of Changes in Estimated GFR and Albuminuria and the Risk of Major Clinical Outcomes.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2019
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antihypertensive treatment and renal protection: Is there a J-curve relationship?Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Relationship between eGFR Decline and Hard Outcomes after Kidney Transplants.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Min JunDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, The George Institute for Global Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia;
Tanvir Chowdhury TurinDepartment of Community Health Sciences, and Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada;
Mark WoodwardDepartment of Community Health Sciences, and The George Institute for Global Health, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; and.
Vlado PerkovicThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia;
Hiddo J Lambers HeerspinkDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Braden J MannsDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Department of Community Health Sciences, and.
Marcello TonelliDepartment of Community Health Sciences, and.
Brenda R HemmelgarnDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Department of Community Health Sciences, and Brenda.Hemmelgarn@albertahealthservices.ca.
The George Institute for Global Health · AUUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Validation of current and promising surrogate outcomes for ESRD in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has been limited. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to further inform the ability of surrogate outcomes for ESRD to predict the efficacy of various interventions on ESRD. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (from inception through September 2013) were searched. All RCTs in adults with proteinuria, diabetes, or CKD stages 1-4 or renal transplant recipients reporting ≥10 ESRD events and a surrogate outcome (change in proteinuria or doubling of serum creatinine [DSCR]) for ESRD during a ≥1-year follow-up were included. Two reviewers abstracted trial characteristics and outcome data independently. To assess the correlation between the surrogate outcomes and ESRD, we determined the treatment effect ratio (TER), defined as the ratio of the treatment effects on ESRD and the effects on the change in surrogate outcomes. TERs close to 1 indicate greater agreement between ESRD and the surrogate, and these ratios were pooled across interventions. We identified 27 trials (97,458 participants; 4187 participants with ESRD). Seven trials reported the effects on change in proteinuria and showed consistent effects for proteinuria and ESRD (TER, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.59 to 1.16), with minimal heterogeneity. Twenty trials reported on DSCR. Treatment effects on DSCR were consistent with the effects on ESRD (TER, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.85 to 1.14), with moderate heterogeneity. In conclusion, DSCR is generally a good surrogate for ESRD, whereas data on proteinuria were limited. Further assessment of the surrogacy of proteinuria using prospective RCTs is warranted.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCreatinineHumansKidney Failure, ChronicProteinuriaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersCreatinineclinical epidemiologyend-stage renal diseaserandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID25556165
PMCPMC4552106
OpenAlexW2109085803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.