Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25556030›Full record

Trial reportCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2015

Safety and activity of temsirolimus and bevacizumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma previously treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a phase 2 consortium study.

Jaime R Merchan, Rui Qin, Henry Pitot, Joel Picus, Glenn Liu, Tom Fitch, William J Maples, Patrick J Flynn, Briant F Fruth, Charles Erlichman

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jaime R MerchanSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW. 12 Avenue. Suite 3400, Miami, FL, 33136, USA, jmerchan2@med.miami.edu.
Rui Qin
Henry Pitot
Joel Picus
Glenn Liu
Tom Fitch
William J Maples
Patrick J Flynn
Briant F Fruth
Charles Erlichman
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USMetro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AMY TRENTHAM-DIETZ · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
Biomarkers for VEGF and mTOR Blockade in Advanced Renal CancerR21CA119545 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MERCHAN, JAIME R · 2006 to 2007
$452k
NCI NIH HHS CA 119545-02NCI NIH HHS N01 CM062205NCI NIH HHS N01-CM62205NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS R21 CA119545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBevacizumab or temsirolimus regimens have clinical activity in the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This phase I/II trial was conducted to determine the safety of combining both agents and its efficacy in RCC patients who progressed on at least one prior anti-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (RTKI) agent.

methodsIn the phase I portion, eligible patients were treated with temsirolimus (25 mg IV weekly) and escalating doses of IV bevacizumab (level 1 = 5 mg/kg; level 2 = 10 mg/kg) every other week. The primary endpoint for the phase II portion (RTKI resistant patients) was the 6-month progression-free rate. Secondary endpoints were response rate, toxicity evaluation, and PFS and OS.

resultsMaximum tolerated dose was not reached at the maximum dose administered in 12 phase I patients. Forty evaluable patients were treated with the phase II recommended dose (temsirolimus 25 mg IV weekly and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks). The 6-month progression-free rate was 40 % (16/40 pts). Median PFS was 5.9 (4-7.8) months, and median OS was 20.6 (11.5-23.7) months. Partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were seen in 23, 63, and 14 % of patients, respectively. Most common grade 3-4 AEs included fatigue (17.8 %), hypertriglyceridemia (11.1 %), stomatitis (8.9 %), proteinuria (8.9 %), abdominal pain (6.7 %), and anemia (6.7 %). Baseline levels of serum sFLT-1 and VEGF-A were inversely correlated with PFS and OS, respectively.

conclusionsTemsirolimus and bevacizumab is a feasible combination in patients with advanced RCC previously exposed to oral anti-VEGF agents. The safety and efficacy results warrant further confirmatory studies in this patient population.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCarcinoma, Renal CellDisease-Free SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabProtein Kinase InhibitorsSirolimustemsirolimusVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID25556030
PMCPMC4348698
OpenAlexW2058769962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.