ArticleDevelopmental biology2015
Differential regenerative capacity of neonatal mouse hearts after cryoinjury.
Article in Developmental biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines for experimental models of myocardial ischemia and infarction.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2018Guideline
- Article
- Mef2c- and Nkx2-5-Divergent Transcriptional Regulation of Chick WT1_76127 and Mouse Gm14014 lncRNAs and Their Implication in Epicardial Cell Migration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Cauterization of the root of the left coronary artery as a straightforward, large and reproducible ischemic injury model in neonatal mice.Lab animal · 2024Review
- Participation of ventricular trabeculae in neonatal cardiac regeneration leads to ectopic recruitment of Purkinje-like cells.Nature cardiovascular research · 2024Article
- Right ventricular cardiomyocyte expansion accompanies cardiac regeneration in newborn mice after large left ventricular infarcts.JCI insight · 2024Article
- Animal models to study cardiac regeneration.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2024Review
- Myocardial Recovery versus Myocardial Regeneration: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Modulation.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2024Review
- Effects and mechanisms of the myocardial microenvironment on cardiomyocyte proliferation and regeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- Comparative Analysis of Heart Regeneration: Searching for the Key to Heal the Heart-Part I: Experimental Injury Models to Study Cardiac Regeneration.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- Regeneration of the heart: from molecular mechanisms to clinical therapeutics.Military Medical Research · 2023Review
- Advances in 3D Organoid Models for Stem Cell-Based Cardiac Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Mending a broken heart-targeting cardiomyocyte regeneration: a literature review.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Review
- Coupled myovascular expansion directs cardiac growth and regeneration.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2022Article
- The regenerative capacity of neonatal tissues.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2022Review
- LRP5 regulates cardiomyocyte proliferation and neonatal heart regeneration by the AKT/P21 pathway.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2022Article
- Regenerative potential of epicardium-derived extracellular vesicles mediated by conserved miRNA transfer.Cardiovascular research · 2022Article
- Identification of Novel and Potent Modulators Involved in Neonatal Cardiac Regeneration.Pediatric cardiology · 2021Article
- Inducible cardiomyocyte injury within the atrioventricular conduction system uncovers latent regenerative capacity in mice.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2021Article
- Biodiversity-based development and evolution: the emerging research systems in model and non-model organisms.Science China. Life sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Neonatal mouse hearts fully regenerate after ventricular resection similar to adult zebrafish. We established cryoinjury models to determine if different types and varying degrees of severity in cardiac injuries trigger different responses in neonatal mouse hearts. In contrast to ventricular resection, neonatal mouse hearts fail to regenerate and show severe impairment of cardiac function post transmural cryoinjury. However, neonatal hearts fully recover after non-transmural cryoinjury. Interestingly, cardiomyocyte proliferation does not significantly increase in neonatal mouse hearts after cryoinjuries. Epicardial activation and new coronary vessel formation occur after cryoinjury. The profibrotic marker PAI-1 is highly expressed after transmural but not non-transmural cryoinjuries, which may contribute to the differential scarring. Our results suggest that regenerative medicine strategies for heart injuries should vary depending on the nature of the injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.