ArticleIrish journal of medical science2016
Management of paediatric acute appendicitis in the general hospital setting: a national survey of preferred surgical technique.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe advent of laparoscopic surgery has facilitated the management of acute appendicitis in the adult population. In the paediatric population (<12 years), management varies according to institution and/or consultant expertise. The aim of this study was to analyse consultant preference for laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in the management of acute appendicitis in children under 12 years presenting to general hospitals.
methodsA 15-point questionnaire was distributed to 81 consultant surgeons identified from the specialist register of the Irish Medical Council and practicing as general surgeons outside of specialist paediatric centres.
resultsA response rate of 83 % (67/81) was obtained. Of the 67 surgeons surveyed, 11 (16 %) had formal paediatric training. Sixty percent (40/67) of surgeons expressed a preference for the open technique. The median frequency of on-call rota was >1 in 5 (32/67) and only 3 % (2/67) claimed that the on-call commitment influenced decision-making regarding surgical approach. The average minimum age (9.3 years, range 1-14) and average minimum weight (25 kg, range 12-70) at which the operating surgeon would perform a laparoscopic appendicectomy were also recorded. Thirty percent (20/67) of consultant general surgeons had immediate access to specialist paediatric laparoscopic equipment. DISCUSSION: This study has shown wide variability amongst consultant general surgeons when considering open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy in children under 12 years. Restricted access to specialist paediatric laparoscopic equipment, combined with declining exposure to paediatric surgical training, may continue to limit the numbers of paediatric laparoscopic appendicectomies performed in the general setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.