Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25555620›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

The beneficial effect of extracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularization in patients with refractory angina.

Gianluca Alunni, Sebastiano Marra, Ilaria Meynet, Maurizio D'amico, Pelloni Elisa, Annalaura Fanelli, Stefano Molinaro, Paolo Garrone, Armando Deberardinis, Mario Campana and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Device-Based Therapies for Refractory Angina.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Contemporary Management of Refractory Angina.Interventional cardiology clinics · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Cardiac shockwave therapy in patients with chronic refractory angina pectoris.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gianluca AlunniDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital S. Giovanni Battista, Turin, Italy. Electronic address: a.gianluca1@virgilio.it.
Sebastiano MarraDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital S. Giovanni Battista, Turin, Italy.
Ilaria MeynetDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital S. Giovanni Battista, Turin, Italy.
Maurizio D'amicoDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital S. Giovanni Battista, Turin, Italy.
Pelloni ElisaDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital S. Giovanni Battista, Turin, Italy.
Annalaura FanelliDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital S. Giovanni Battista, Turin, Italy.
Stefano MolinaroDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital S. Giovanni Battista, Turin, Italy.
Paolo GarroneDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital S. Giovanni Battista, Turin, Italy.
Armando DeberardinisDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital S. Giovanni Battista, Turin, Italy.
Mario CampanaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital S. Giovanni Battista, Turin, Italy.
Amir LermanDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Giovanni Battista · ITMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Ultrasound Shockwave Therapy for Post-Stenotic Microvascular RemodelingR01HL123160 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LERMAN, AMIR, LERMAN, LILACH O · 2015 to 2018
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL123160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe incidence of patients with refractory angina (RA) is increasing. Medical therapy for RA is limited and prognosis is poor. Experimental data suggest that the use of Extracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularization (ESMR) may contribute to angiogenesis and improve symptoms of angina in patients with RA. Purpose of our study is to determine the efficacy of cardiac shock wave therapy (ESMR) in the management of patients with nonrevascolarized coronary artery disease (CAD).

methodsWe performed a prospective cohort study to examine the efficacy of ESMR applcation in patients with RA despite optimal medical therapy, not suitable for further PCI or CABG. Characteristics such as angina class scores (CCS class score), nitroglycerin consumption and hospitalization rate among cases (patients with RA who received ESMR) and controls (patients with RA who did not receive ESMR) were compared at baseline and 6 months after ESMR therapy. In patients receiveing d ESMR the effect of on cardiac perfusion was assessed.

resultsThere were 43 patients in the case group and 29 patients in the control group. The mean age of the patients was 70 ± 9.5 years in the case group and 71 ± 5.3 years in the control group. Other characteristics (diabetes, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneus coronary intervention, baseline CCS class score) were similar in both groups. There was a significant improvement in CCS class score (1.33 ± 0.57 in cases and 1.92 ± 0.69 in controls; p = 0.0002), nitroglycerin consumption (20% in case cases, and 44.8% in controls; P < 0.03) and hospitalization rate significantly reduced (13.9% in case cases, and 37.9% in controls; P < 0.03). The patients who received ESMR, there was a significantly improvement in myocardial perfusion after 6 months with a 33% relative reduction of summed stress score (SSS) (p = 0.002).

conclusionThis case control study demonstrates the beneficial effect of ESMR therapy on cardiac symptoms, myocardial perfusion and reduced hospitalization in patients with refractory angina. Ther current study supports a role for ESMR as a non-invasive therapuetic option for patients with RA.

Indexed as

AgedAngina PectorisCase-Control StudiesFemaleHigh-Energy Shock WavesHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingMyocardial RevascularizationNitroglycerinProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonNitroglycerinVasodilator AgentsEchocardiographyRefractory anginaShock wave therapy

Identifiers

PMID25555620
PMCPMC6093289
OpenAlexW1977632844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.