Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25555306›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2015

A low cost real-time motion tracking approach using webcam technology.

Chandramouli Krishnan, Edward P Washabaugh, Yogesh Seetharaman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rest the brain to learn new gait patterns after stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Rest the Brain to Learn New Gait Patterns after Stroke.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chandramouli KrishnanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: mouli@umich.edu.
Edward P WashabaughDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Yogesh SeetharamanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

NRI: Wearable eMbots to Induce Recovery of FunctionR01EB019834 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DURFEE, WILLIAM K, GILLESPIE, RICHARD BRENT · 2014 to 2016
$854k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB019834NIBIB NIH HHS R01-EB019834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical therapy is an important component of gait recovery for individuals with locomotor dysfunction. There is a growing body of evidence that suggests that incorporating a motor learning task through visual feedback of movement trajectory is a useful approach to facilitate therapeutic outcomes. Visual feedback is typically provided by recording the subject's limb movement patterns using a three-dimensional motion capture system and displaying it in real-time using customized software. However, this approach can seldom be used in the clinic because of the technical expertise required to operate this device and the cost involved in procuring a three-dimensional motion capture system. In this paper, we describe a low cost two-dimensional real-time motion tracking approach using a simple webcam and an image processing algorithm in LabVIEW Vision Assistant. We also evaluated the accuracy of this approach using a high precision robotic device (Lokomat) across various walking speeds. Further, the reliability and feasibility of real-time motion-tracking were evaluated in healthy human participants. The results indicated that the measurements from the webcam tracking approach were reliable and accurate. Experiments on human subjects also showed that participants could utilize the real-time kinematic feedback generated from this device to successfully perform a motor learning task while walking on a treadmill. These findings suggest that the webcam motion tracking approach is a feasible low cost solution to perform real-time movement analysis and training.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsRoboticsSoftwareBiomechanical PhenomenaExercise TestFeedback, SensoryGaitHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLocomotionMaleReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultGaitKinematicsMotion trackingMotor learningReal time

Identifiers

PMID25555306
PMCPMC4306621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.