Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25554798›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2015

Identification of a conserved set of upregulated genes in mouse skeletal muscle hypertrophy and regrowth.

Thomas Chaillou, Janna R Jackson, Jonathan H England, Tyler J Kirby, Jena Richards-White, Karyn A Esser, Esther E Dupont-Versteegden, John J McCarthy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The impact of skeletal muscle contraction on CD146American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecular Regulation of Exercise-Induced Muscle Fiber Hypertrophy.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Sex differences in tendon structure and function.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas ChaillouCenter for Muscle Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky;
Janna R JacksonCenter for Muscle Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Jonathan H EnglandCenter for Muscle Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky;
Tyler J KirbyCenter for Muscle Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Jena Richards-WhiteDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Karyn A EsserCenter for Muscle Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky;
Esther E Dupont-VersteegdenCenter for Muscle Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
John J McCarthyCenter for Muscle Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; jjmcca2@email.uky.edu.

Funding

SKELETAL MUSCLE HYPERTROPHY AND INTRACELLULAR SIGNALINGR01AR045617 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI ESSER, KARYN A · 1999 to 2011
$2.9M
BetaCatenin Regulation of Skeletal Muscle HypertrophyR01AR061939 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI ESSER, KARYN A, MCCARTHY, JOHN JOSEPH · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS AR45617NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR061939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the gene expression profile of mouse skeletal muscle undergoing two forms of growth (hypertrophy and regrowth) with the goal of identifying a conserved set of differentially expressed genes. Expression profiling by microarray was performed on the plantaris muscle subjected to 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 days of hypertrophy or regrowth following 2 wk of hind-limb suspension. We identified 97 differentially expressed genes (≥2-fold increase or ≥50% decrease compared with control muscle) that were conserved during the two forms of muscle growth. The vast majority (∼90%) of the differentially expressed genes was upregulated and occurred at a single time point (64 out of 86 genes), which most often was on the first day of the time course. Microarray analysis from the conserved upregulated genes showed a set of genes related to contractile apparatus and stress response at day 1, including three genes involved in mechanotransduction and four genes encoding heat shock proteins. Our analysis further identified three cell cycle-related genes at day and several genes associated with extracellular matrix (ECM) at both days 3 and 10. In conclusion, we have identified a core set of genes commonly upregulated in two forms of muscle growth that could play a role in the maintenance of sarcomere stability, ECM remodeling, cell proliferation, fast-to-slow fiber type transition, and the regulation of skeletal muscle growth. These findings suggest conserved regulatory mechanisms involved in the adaptation of skeletal muscle to increased mechanical loading.

Indexed as

AnimalsDown-RegulationGene Expression ProfilingHindlimb SuspensionHypertrophyMaleMiceMuscle DevelopmentMuscle, SkeletalMuscular DiseasesTranscriptomeUp-Regulationextracellular matrixhind-limb suspensionmechanotransductionstress responsetranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID25554798
PMCPMC4347749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.