ArticleJournal of translational medicine & epidemiology2014
Pioneering the Transdisciplinary Team Science Approach: Lessons Learned from National Cancer Institute Grantees.
Article in Journal of translational medicine & epidemiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers and facilitators of conducting research with team science approach: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2023Pooled it
- Interpretive ethnographic studies and in-depth qualitative research should be treated as high-quality evidence in the science of team science.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Procedural Physician-Scientists as Catalysts for Innovation in Team Science and Clinical Care.Cancers · 2025Article
- Applying theory to practice in a large research center: creating and implementing tools for building convergence capacity in individuals and teams.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- A transdisciplinary dual degree curriculum yields novel and successful learning outcomes: early lessons from training physicianeers.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Considerations and recommendations for collaborative research networks in epidemiology: Lessons learned from the diabetes LEAD Network.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Common criteria for evaluating cross-disciplinary research in global health: a scoping review.BMC global and public health · 2024Article
- Metabolic Dysregulation and Cancer Risk Program (MeDOC): a transdisciplinary approach to obesity-associated cancers.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
- Collaboration and growth in a large research cooperative: A network analytic approach.Evaluation and program planning · 2024Article
- Moving toward transdisciplinary approaches to addressing HIV and psychological trauma: Barriers and facilitators to building collaborations.Journal of traumatic stress · 2023Article
- Exploring team dynamics during the development of a multi-institutional cross-disciplinary translational team: Implications for potential best practices.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Optimizing team science in an academic medical center: A qualitative examination of investigator perspectives.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Multi-, Inter-, and Transdisciplinarity within the Public Health Workforce: A Scoping Review to Assess Definitions and Applications of Concepts.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Interdisciplinary Collaborations in Digital Health Research: Mixed Methods Case Study.JMIR human factors · 2022Article
- Article
- Using the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) Building Block Approach to Implement System Evaluation Theory (SET).The American journal of evaluation · 2021Article
- A team science approach to discover novel targets for infantile spasms (IS).Epilepsia open · 2021Article
- Scholastic synergy: A team prototype for pharmacy faculty engagement in education, research, and service.Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning · 2021Article
- Conceptual models for implementing solution-oriented team science in large research consortia.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Transdisciplinary research outcomes based on the Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer II initiative experience.Research Evaluation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The National Cancer Institute has been a leader in supporting transdisciplinary (TD) team science. From 2005-2010, the NCI supported Transdisciplinary Research on Energetic and Cancer I (TREC I), a center initiative fostering the TD integration of social, behavioral, and biological sciences to examine the relationships among obesity, nutrition, physical activity and cancer. In the final year of TREC I, we conducted qualitative in-depth-interviews with 31 participating investigators and trainees to learn more about their experiences with TD team science, including challenges, facilitating factors, strategies for success, and impacts. Five main challenges emerged: (1) limited published guidance for how to engage in TD team science, when TREC I was implemented; (2) conceptual and scientific challenges inherent to efforts to achieve TD integration; (3) discipline-based differences in values, terminology, methods, and work styles; (4) project management challenges involved in TD team science; and (5) traditional incentive and reward systems that do not recognize or reward TD team science. Four main facilitating factors and strategies for success emerged: (1) beneficial attitudes and beliefs about TD research and team science; (2) effective team processes; (3) brokering and bridge-building activities by individuals holding particular roles in a research center; and (4) funding initiative characteristics that support TD team science. Broad impacts of participating in TD team science in the context of TREC I included: (1) new positive attitudes about TD research and team science; (2) new boundary-crossing collaborations; (3) scientific advances related to research approaches, findings, and dissemination; (4) institutional culture change and resource creation in support of TD team science; and (5) career advancement. Funding agencies, academic institutions, and scholarly journals can help to foster TD team science through funding opportunities, institutional policies on extra-departmental and cross-school collaboration, promotion and tenure policies, and publishing opportunities for TD research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25554748PMC4280018What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.