Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25554233›Full record

Trial reportPsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2015

Reengaging veterans with serious mental illness into care: preliminary results from a national randomized trial.

Amy M Kilbourne, David E Goodrich, Zongshan Lai, Daniel Almirall, Kristina M Nord, Nicholas W Bowersox, Kristen M Abraham

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amy M KilbourneWith the exception of Dr. Almirall, the authors are with the Veterans Affairs (VA) Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor (e-mail: amykilbo@umich.edu ). Dr. Abraham is also with the Department of Psychology, University of Detroit Mercy, Detroit. Dr. Almirall is with the Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
David E Goodrich
Zongshan Lai
Daniel Almirall
Kristina M Nord
Nicholas W Bowersox
Kristen M Abraham

Funding

Population-based Outreach Services to Reduce Homelessness among Veterans with SMII01HX000617 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI KILBOURNE, AMY M · 2016 to 2016
–
HSRD VA I01 HX000617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study compared effectiveness of an enhanced versus standard implementation strategy (Replicating Effective Programs [REP]) on site-level uptake of Re-Engage, a national program for veterans with serious mental illness.

methodsMental health providers at 158 Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities were given REP-based manuals and training in Re-Engage, which involved identifying veterans who had not been seen in VA care for at least one year, documenting their clinical status, and coordinating further health care. After six months, facilities not responding to REP (N=88) were randomized to receive six months of facilitation (enhanced REP) or continued standard REP. Site-level uptake was defined as percentage of patients (N=1,531) with updated documentation or with whom contact was attempted.

resultsRate of Re-Engage uptake was greater for enhanced REP sites compared with standard REP sites (41% versus 31%, p=.01). Total REP facilitation time was 7.3 hours per site for six months.

conclusionsAdded facilitation improved short-term uptake of a national mental health program.

Indexed as

Veterans HealthAdultHumansMental DisordersMental Health ServicesPatient DropoutsProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans

Identifiers

PMID25554233
PMCPMC4640185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.