Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25554014›Full record

Trial reportGeneral hospital psychiatry

Collaborative care for pain results in both symptom improvement and sustained reduction of pain and depression.

Stephen Thielke, Kathryn Corson, Steven K Dobscha

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in General hospital psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00129480 (Improving the Treatment of Chronic Pain in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00129480 nacompletednot on this map

Improving the Treatment of Chronic Pain in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2006 to 2010Enrolled401ConditionsPain, Chronic Disease, DepressionArmsAssistance with Pain treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The Role of Integrated Care in Managing Chronic Pain.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2017
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephen ThielkePsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Puget Sound VA Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98108, USA. Electronic address: sthielke@u.washington.edu.
Kathryn CorsonPortland Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Steven K DobschaPortland Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.

Funding

Development and Evaluation of a Depression Risk CalculatorK23MH093591 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI THIELKE, STEPHEN M. · 2010 to 2013
$474k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH093591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTraditional analytic approaches may oversimplify the mechanisms by which interventions effect change. Transition probability models can quantify both symptom improvement and sustained reduction in symptoms. We sought to quantify transition probabilities between higher and lower states for four outcome variables and to compare two treatment arms with respect to these transitions.

methodSecondary analysis of a year-long collaborative care intervention for chronic musculoskeletal pain in veterans. Forty-two clinicians were randomized to intervention or treatment as usual (TAU), with 401 patients nested within clinician. The outcome variables, pain intensity, pain interference, depression and disability scores were dichotomized (lower/higher). Probabilities of symptom improvement (transitioning from higher to lower) or sustained reduction (remaining lower) were compared between intervention and TAU groups at 0- to 3-, 3- to 6- and 6- to 12-month intervals. General estimating equations quantified the effect of the intervention on transitions.

resultsIn adjusted models, the intervention group showed about 1.5 times greater odds of both symptom improvement and sustained reduction compared to TAU, for all the outcomes except disability.

conclusionsDespite no formal relapse prevention program, intervention patients were more likely than TAU patients to experience continued relief from depression and pain. Collaborative care interventions may provide benefits beyond just symptom reduction.

Indexed as

AgedChronic PainCooperative BehaviorDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal PainOutcome Assessment, Health CareSingle-Blind MethodVeteransCollaborativePainRelapseRemissionTransition

Identifiers

PMID25554014
PMCPMC4361309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.