Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25553506›Full record

Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2015

Etomidate-remifentanil is more suitable for monitored anesthesia care during gastroscopy in older patients than propofol-remifentanil.

Xiao-Chun Shen, Xing Ao, Yan Cao, Li Lan, Xin-Man Liu, Wen-Jing Sun, Ping Li, Chun-Hui Lan

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Target-Controlled Infusion of Propofol in Training Anesthesiology Residents in Colonoscopy Sedation: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016
    Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiao-Chun ShenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China (mainland).
Xing AoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China (mainland).
Yan CaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China (mainland).
Li LanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China (mainland).
Xin-Man LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China (mainland).
Wen-Jing SunDepartment of Gastroenterology, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China (mainland).
Ping LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China (mainland).
Chun-Hui LanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China (mainland).
Daping Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis prospective and randomized study was designed to compare safety, potential complications, and patient and examiner satisfaction of 2 anesthetic combinations - etomidate-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil - in elderly patients undergoing diagnostic gastroscopy. MATERIAL AND

methodsA group of 720 patients, aged 60-80 years, scheduled for diagnostic gastroscopy under sedation were prospectively randomized. After 0.4-0.6 μg kg⁻¹ of remifentanil was infused, etomidate or propofol was administered. Patients in the etomidate group received doses of etomidate at 0.1-0.15 mg kg⁻¹ followed by 4-6 mg. Patients in the propofol group received doses of propofol at 1-2 mg kg⁻¹ followed by 20-40 mg. Physiological indexes were evaluated for the 715 of 720 patients that completed the treatment. The onset time, duration time, and discharge time were recorded. Physicians, anesthetists, and patients were surveyed to assess their satisfaction.

resultsSystolic pressure and diastolic pressure decreased significantly after the procedure in the propofol group (P<0.001). The average heart rate was significantly lower in the propofol group (P<0.05). No periods of desaturation (SpO₂ <95%) were observed in either group. The onset time was earlier in the etomidate group (P=0.00). All adverse events, with the exception of myoclonus, were greater in the propofol group, and physician and patient satisfaction in both groups was similar.

conclusionsEtomidate-remifentanil administration for sedation and analgesia during gastroscopy resulted in more stable hemodynamic responses and less adverse events in older patients.

Indexed as

AgedAnalysis of VarianceAnesthesiaAnesthetics, IntravenousBlood PressureDose-Response Relationship, DrugEtomidateGastroscopyHeart RateHumansMiddle AgedPiperidinesPropofolProspective StudiesRemifentanilTime FactorsAnesthetics, IntravenousEtomidatePiperidinesPropofolRemifentanil

Identifiers

PMID25553506
PMCPMC4288392
OpenAlexW2040479701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.