Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25553282›Full record

ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2015

Evaluation of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry-based VITEK MS system for the identification of Acinetobacter species from blood cultures: comparison with VITEK 2 and MicroScan systems.

Seung Yeob Lee, Jong Hee Shin, Soo Hyun Kim, Myung Geun Shin, Soon Pal Suh, Dong Wook Ryang

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antimicrobial Resistance inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seung Yeob LeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Jong Hee ShinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Soo Hyun KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Myung Geun ShinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Soon Pal SuhDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Dong Wook RyangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Chonnam National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcinetobacter species are the leading cause of bloodstream infection (BSI), but their correct identification is challenging. We evaluated the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)-based VITEK MS (bioMérieux, France), and two automated systems, VITEK 2 (bioMérieux) and MicroScan (Siemens, USA) for identification of Acinetobacter BSI isolates.

methodsA total of 187 BSI isolates recovered at a university hospital in Korea between 2010 and 2012 were analyzed. The identification results obtained using VITEK MS and two automated systems were compared with those of rpoB sequencing.

resultsOf 187 isolates analyzed, 176 were identified to the species level by rpoB sequencing: the Acinetobacter baumannii group (ABG; 101 A. baumannii, 43 A. nosocomialis, 10 A. pittii isolates) was most commonly identified (82.4%), followed by Acinetobacter genomic species 13BJ/14TU (5.3%), A. ursingii (2.1%), A. soli (2.1%), A. bereziniae (1.1%), and A. junii (1.1%). Correct identification rates to the species group (ABG) level or the species level was comparable among the three systems (VITEK MS, 90.3%; VITEK 2, 89.2%; MicroScan, 86.9%). However, VITEK MS generated fewer misidentifications (0.6%) than VITEK 2 (10.8%) and MicroScan (13.1%) (P<0.001). In addition, VITEK MS demonstrated higher specificity (100%) for discrimination between ABG and non-ABG isolates than the other systems (both, 31.8%) (P<0.001).

conclusionsThe VITEK MS system is superior to the VITEK 2 and MicroScan systems for identification of Acinetobacter BSI isolates, with fewer misidentifications and better discrimination between the ABG and non-ABG isolates.

Indexed as

Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationAcinetobacterAcinetobacter InfectionsBacterial ProteinsBacterial Typing TechniquesBloodDatabases, GeneticDNA, BacterialHumansBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialAcinetobacterIdentificationMicroScanVITEK 2VITEK MS

Identifiers

PMID25553282
PMCPMC4272967
OpenAlexW2140876391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.