Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25553244›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2014

Productivity losses in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based survey.

Marta Erdal, Ane Johannessen, Jan Erik Askildsen, Tomas Eagan, Amund Gulsvik, Rune Grønseth

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marta ErdalDepartment of Thoracic Medicine , Haukeland University Hospital , Bergen , Norway.
Ane JohannessenCentre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital , Bergen , Norway.
Jan Erik AskildsenDepartment of Economics , University of Bergen , Bergen , Norway.
Tomas EaganDepartment of Thoracic Medicine , Haukeland University Hospital , Bergen , Norway ; Department of Clinical Science , University of Bergen , Norway.
Amund GulsvikDepartment of Clinical Science , University of Bergen , Norway.
Rune GrønsethDepartment of Thoracic Medicine , Haukeland University Hospital , Bergen , Norway ; Department of Clinical Science , University of Bergen , Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to estimate incremental productivity losses (sick leave and disability) of spirometry-defined chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in a population-based sample and in hospital-recruited patients with COPD. Furthermore, we examined predictors of productivity losses by multivariate analyses.

methodsWe performed four quarterly telephone interviews of 53 and 107 population-based patients with COPD and controls, as well as 102 hospital-recruited patients with COPD below retirement age. Information was gathered regarding annual productivity loss, exacerbations of respiratory symptoms and comorbidities. Incremental productivity losses were estimated by multivariate quantile median regression according to the human capital approach, adjusting for sex, age, smoking habits, education and lung function. Main effect variables were COPD/control status, number of comorbidities and exacerbations of respiratory symptoms.

resultsAltogether 55%, 87% and 31% of population-based COPD cases, controls and hospital patients, respectively, had a paid job at baseline. The annual incremental productivity losses were 5.8 (95% CI 1.4 to 10.1) and 330.6 (95% CI 327.8 to 333.3) days, comparing population-recruited and hospital-recruited patients with COPD to controls, respectively. There were significantly higher productivity losses associated with female sex and less education. Additional adjustments for comorbidities, exacerbations and FEV1% predicted explained all productivity losses in the population-based sample, as well as nearly 40% of the productivity losses in hospital-recruited patients.

conclusionsAnnual incremental productivity losses were more than 50 times higher in hospital-recruited patients with COPD than that of population-recruited patients with COPD. To ensure a precise estimation of societal burden, studies on patients with COPD should be population-based.

Indexed as

COPD epidemiologyHealth Economist

Identifiers

PMID25553244
PMCPMC4256604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.