Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25553135›Full record

ReviewMaedica2014

Is there a Link Between Atherothrombosis and Deep Venous Thrombosis?

Maria-Cristina Andrei, Aurel Andercou

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Maedica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria-Cristina AndreiEmergency County Clinical Hospital, Clinic of Surgery II, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Aurel AndercouEmergency County Clinical Hospital, Clinic of Surgery II, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractVenous and arterial thromboses have traditionnally been regarded as separate diseases with different causes. Clinical experience shows, that the arterial atherothrombotic disease can be associated with venous thrombotic disease, but there is insufficient evidence to prove and explain the nature of this association.This review focuses on the risk factors associated with both arterial and venous thrombotic events, and recent epidemiological studies have documented an association between these vascular complications.According to the results of recent studies, atherosclerosis and venous thrombosis share common risk factors, including age, obesity, cigarette smoking, and metabolic syndrome.Several studies have demonstrated that subjects with idiopathic venous thrombosis have an increased risk of cardiovascular events compared with subjects with secondary thrombosis or control group. On the other hand, atherosclerosis has the potential to promote the development of thrombotic disorders in the venous system. Based on the results of population studies carried out in the United States, atherosclerosis is unlikely to constitute a risk factor for venous thrombosis. In conclusion, the separate nature of arterial and venous disorders has been challenged. Future studies are needed to clarify the nature of this association, and to evaluate its implications for clinical practice.

Indexed as

atherosclerosisdeep venous thrombosisprospective studyrisk factor

Identifiers

PMID25553135
PMCPMC4268301
OpenAlexW963920094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.