ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2015
New Mexico practitioners' access to and satisfaction with online clinical information resources: an interview study using qualitative data analysis software.
Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers and facilitators to clinical information seeking: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Pooled it
- Rural providers' access to online resources: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2016Trial
- Physician experiences with clinical uncertainty in the trauma setting: making clinical guidance accessible to those in need.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Article
- NVivo.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2022Review
- Examining care navigation: librarian participation in a team-based approach?Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
questionsWhat information resources are available to health care practitioners not affiliated with the University of New Mexico? How satisfied are they with those resources?
settingThe state is rural and medically underserved.
methodsThe authors interviewed practitioners, using a nine-item guide. Interview transcripts were coded using QSR NVivo 9 software. MAIN
resultsFifty-one practitioners were interviewed. Most use online information resources. Many have access to a point-of-care resource within an electronic health records system. They often expressed dissatisfaction with available patient education resources.
conclusionNew Mexico practitioners routinely use electronic information resources but indicate they need better patient information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.