ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2015
Analysis of malignancies in patients after heart transplantation with subsequent immunosuppressive therapy.
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence and risk factors for skin cancer after heart transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Pooled it
- Skin cancer after heart transplantation: a systematic review.Anais brasileiros de dermatologiaPooled it
- Optimizing the Safety Profile of Everolimus by Delayed Initiation in De Novo Heart Transplant Recipients: Results of the Prospective Randomized Study EVERHEART.Transplantation · 2018Trial
- Heart transplantation in pediatric oncology patients.JHLT open · 2026Article
- The burden of skin cancer in heart transplant recipients: Impact of immunosuppressive regimens.JHLT open · 2025Article
- Heart Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Transplant oncology and anti-cancer immunosuppressants.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- The ABC of Heart Transplantation-Part 1: Indication, Eligibility, Donor Selection, and Surgical Technique.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Management of Cutaneous Head and Neck Squamous and Basal Cell Carcinomas for Immunocompromised Patients.Cancers · 2023Review
- Diabetes Is an Independent Risk Factor for Cancer after Heart and/or Lung Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- NONMELANOMA SKIN CANCER IN A HEART TRANSPLANT PATIENT: A CASE REPORT AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE.Acta clinica Croatica · 2022Review
- Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder Following Cardiac Transplantation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Characteristics, outcomes, and predictors ofFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Pre-transplant Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Is Associated With Higher Graft Failure and Increased 5-Year Mortality After Heart Transplantation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Risk Factors, Treatment and Prognosis of Patients with Lung Cancer after Heart Transplantation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Complete remission from post-heart transplant lymphoproliferative disorder: A case report.Journal of cardiology cases · 2021Article
- Elevated pre-transplant pulmonary vascular resistance is associated with early post-transplant atrial fibrillation and mortality.ESC heart failure · 2020Observational
- Risk factors and survival of patients with permanent pacemaker implantation after heart transplantation.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
- Control of cardiac chronotropic function in patients after heart transplantation: effects of ivabradine and metoprolol succinate on resting heart rate in the denervated heart.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2018Observational
- COPD in patients after heart transplantation is associated with a prolonged hospital stay, early posttransplant atrial fibrillation, and impaired posttransplant survival.Clinical epidemiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to analyze the distribution of malignancies in patients after heart transplantation (HTX) and to evaluate the risk factors including immunosuppressive therapy with regard to the development of malignancies and survival. Special emphasis was placed on the effects of a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) containing immunosuppressive regimen.
methodsA total of 381 patients (age ≥18 years) receiving HTX were included in the present analysis. All patients were followed-up at the University of Heidelberg Heart Center, Heidelberg, Germany. Data were retrieved from the Heidelberg Registry for Heart Transplantation being collected between 1989 and 2014. According to center standard, all patients received induction therapy with anti-thymocyte globulin guided by T-cell monitoring since 1994. The initial immunosuppressive regimen consisting of cyclosporine A (CsA) and azathioprine (AZA) was replaced by CsA and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in 2001 and by tacrolimus (TAC) and MMF in 2006. Additionally, mTOR inhibitors (everolimus/sirolimus) were applied since 2003.
resultsMean recipient age at HTX was 51.2±10.5 years and the mean follow-up period after HTX was 9.7±5.9 years. During follow-up, 130 patients developed a neoplasm (34.1% of total). Subgroup analysis revealed 58 patients with cutaneous malignancy only (15.2%), 56 patients with noncutaneous malignancy only (14.7%), and 16 patients with both cutaneous and noncutaneous malignancy (4.2%). Statistically significant risk factors associated with an increased risk of malignancy after HTX were older age (P<0.0001), male recipients (P=0.0008), dyslipidemia (P=0.0263), diabetes mellitus (P=0.0003), renal insufficiency (P=0.0247), and >1 treated rejection episode (TRE) in the first year after HTX (P=0.0091). Administration of CsA (P=0.0195), AZA (P=0.0008), or steroids (P=0.0018) for >1 year after HTX was associated with increased development of malignancy, whereas administration of MMF (P<0.0001) or mTOR inhibitors (P<0.0001) was associated with a lower risk for development of malignancy. Additionally, 5-year follow-up of cutaneous malignancy recurrence (P=0.0065) and noncutaneous malignancy mortality (P=0.0011) was significantly lower in patients receiving an mTOR inhibitor containing therapy after the development of a malignancy.
conclusionThis study highlights the complexity of risk factors including immunosuppression with regard to the development of malignancies after HTX. mTOR-inhibitor-based immunosuppression is associated with a better outcome after HTX, particularly in cases with noncutaneous malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.