ArticleJournal of neurosciences in rural practice2015
Pathophysiology of acute middle cerebral artery infarct by multimodal computed tomography: A pilot study in Thai patients.
Article in Journal of neurosciences in rural practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe purpose of this study was to study pathophysiology of acute middle cerebral artery infarct using multimodal CT and to evaluate the safety and feasibility of this method in our center. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients who had moderate to severe stroke (NIHSS score > 10), suspected of anterior circulation infarct and presented within 4 hours after stroke onset were prospectively included. Multimodal CTs, using low-osmolar contrast agents, were performed in all patients.
resultsTwenty-two patients were included. Mean NIHSS was 16. All patients received intravenous thrombolysis. Favorable outcome was found in nine patients (41%). CTP was unable to identify ischemic lesions in three patients with small subcortical infarct. Most patients (82%) with large middle cerebral artery infarct still had some salvageable brain (penumbra) which partly recovered in a follow-up imaging. Eleven patients (50%) had major artery occlusion. Two patients had creatinine rising within 72 hours.
conclusionsMultimodal CT does provide information about status of major artery and the volume of salvageable/infarct brain tissue and is safely and easily applicable in our center.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.