Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25552612›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2014

Representations of the health value of vitamin D supplementation in newspapers: media content analysis.

Timothy Caulfield, Marianne I Clark, James P McCormack, Christen Rachul, Catherine J Field

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Timothy CaulfieldHealth Law Institute, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Marianne I ClarkHealth Law Institute, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
James P McCormackFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Christen RachulSchool of Linguistics and Language Studies, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Catherine J FieldDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the nature of media coverage of vitamin D in relation to its role in health and the need for supplements.

designMedia content analysis.

settingPrint articles from elite newspapers in the UK, the USA and Canada.

participants294 print newspaper articles appearing over 5 years (2009-2014).

resultsNewspaper coverage of vitamin D generally supported supplementation. The most common framing of vitamin D in print articles was "adequate vitamin D is necessary for good health." Articles also framed vitamin D as difficult to obtain from food supply and framed vitamin D deficiency as a widespread concern. In discussions of supplementation, 80% articles suggested supplementation is or may be necessary for the general population, yet almost none of the articles discussed the potential harms of vitamin D supplementation in any detail. Print articles named 40 different health conditions in relationship to vitamin D. The most commonly cited conditions included bone health, cancer and cardiovascular health. Although print articles referred to a wide range of scholarly research on vitamin D with varying degrees of endorsement for supplementation, a general tone of support for vitamin D supplementation in media coverage persisted.

conclusionsNewspaper articles conveyed overall support for vitamin D supplementation. News articles linked vitamin D to a wide range of health conditions for which there is no conclusive scientific evidence. Media coverage downplayed the limitations of existing science and overlooked any potential risks associated with supplementation.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsHealth StatusNewspapers as TopicCanadaHumansVitamin DVitaminsVitamin DVitaminsMEDICAL JOURNALISMNUTRITION & DIETETICSPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID25552612
PMCPMC4281532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.