Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25552534›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2014

Genomics of ecological adaptation in cactophilic Drosophila.

Yolanda Guillén, Núria Rius, Alejandra Delprat, Anna Williford, Francesc Muyas, Marta Puig, Sònia Casillas, Miquel Ràmia, Raquel Egea, Barbara Negre and 20 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Olfactory variation among closely related cactophilic Drosophila species.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diverse signatures of convergent evolution in cacti-associated yeasts.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Assessing the Architecture ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Yolanda GuillénDepartament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Núria RiusDepartament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Alejandra DelpratDepartament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Anna WillifordDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington.
Francesc MuyasDepartament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Marta PuigDepartament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Sònia CasillasDepartament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Miquel RàmiaDepartament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Raquel EgeaDepartament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Barbara NegreEMBL/CRG Research Unit in Systems Biology, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona, Spain Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.
Gisela MirIRTA, Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG) CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus UAB, Edifici CRAG, Barcelona, Spain The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jordi CampsCentro Nacional de Análisis Genómico (CNAG), Parc Científic de Barcelona, Torre I, Barcelona, Spain.
Valentí MoncunillBarcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Edifici TG (Torre Girona), Barcelona, Spain and Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain.
Francisco J Ruiz-RuanoDepartamento de Genética, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Spain.
Josefa CabreroDepartamento de Genética, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Spain.
Leonardo G de LimaInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Guilherme B DiasInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Jeronimo C RuizInformática de Biossistemas, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou-Fiocruz Minas, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Aurélie KapustaDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Utah School of Medicine.
Jordi Garcia-MasIRTA, Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG) CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus UAB, Edifici CRAG, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta GutCentro Nacional de Análisis Genómico (CNAG), Parc Científic de Barcelona, Torre I, Barcelona, Spain.
Ivo G GutCentro Nacional de Análisis Genómico (CNAG), Parc Científic de Barcelona, Torre I, Barcelona, Spain.
David TorrentsBarcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Edifici TG (Torre Girona), Barcelona, Spain and Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain.
Juan P CamachoDepartamento de Genética, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Spain.
Gustavo C S KuhnInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Cédric FeschotteDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Utah School of Medicine.
Andrew G ClarkDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University.
Esther BetránDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington.
Antonio BarbadillaDepartament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Alfredo RuizDepartament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain alfredo.ruiz@uab.cat.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESCentro Nacional de Análisis Genómico · ESUniversidad de Granada · ESUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRCenter for Research in Agricultural Genomics · ESThe University of Texas at Arlington · USUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya · ESUniversity of Utah · USCornell University · USPompeu Fabra University · ES

Funding

Sexual conflict and relocation of genes by duplicationR01GM071813 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ARLINGTON · PI BETRAN, ESTHER · 2005 to 2014
$1.5M
Human DNA transposons: evolutionary history and genomic impactR01GM077582 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI FESCHOTTE, CEDRIC · 2007 to 2015
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071813NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM071813NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cactophilic Drosophila species provide a valuable model to study gene-environment interactions and ecological adaptation. Drosophila buzzatii and Drosophila mojavensis are two cactophilic species that belong to the repleta group, but have very different geographical distributions and primary host plants. To investigate the genomic basis of ecological adaptation, we sequenced the genome and developmental transcriptome of D. buzzatii and compared its gene content with that of D. mojavensis and two other noncactophilic Drosophila species in the same subgenus. The newly sequenced D. buzzatii genome (161.5 Mb) comprises 826 scaffolds (>3 kb) and contains 13,657 annotated protein-coding genes. Using RNA sequencing data of five life-stages we found expression of 15,026 genes, 80% protein-coding genes, and 20% noncoding RNA genes. In total, we detected 1,294 genes putatively under positive selection. Interestingly, among genes under positive selection in the D. mojavensis lineage, there is an excess of genes involved in metabolism of heterocyclic compounds that are abundant in Stenocereus cacti and toxic to nonresident Drosophila species. We found 117 orphan genes in the shared D. buzzatii-D. mojavensis lineage. In addition, gene duplication analysis identified lineage-specific expanded families with functional annotations associated with proteolysis, zinc ion binding, chitin binding, sensory perception, ethanol tolerance, immunity, physiology, and reproduction. In summary, we identified genetic signatures of adaptation in the shared D. buzzatii-D. mojavensis lineage, and in the two separate D. buzzatii and D. mojavensis lineages. Many of the novel lineage-specific genomic features are promising candidates for explaining the adaptation of these species to their distinct ecological niches.

Indexed as

Genome, InsectAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsCactaceaeDrosophilaEcosystemGene Expression RegulationGenomicsMolecular Sequence AnnotationOpen Reading FramesSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomecactophilic Drosophilaecological adaptationgene duplicationgenome sequenceorphan genespositive selection

Identifiers

PMID25552534
PMCPMC4316639
OpenAlexW2123443731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.