Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25552303›Full record

ReviewBrain : a journal of neurology2015

Pathophysiological concepts in the congenital myopathies: blurring the boundaries, sharpening the focus.

Gianina Ravenscroft, Nigel G Laing, Carsten G Bönnemann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Expanding the spectrum ofJournal of neuromuscular diseases · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A novel pathogenic variant c.44A > G (p. Asp15Gly) inMolecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2025
    Article
  5. MAGEL2 (patho-)physiology and Schaaf-Yang syndrome.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Clinical phenotype and next-generation sequencing as essential tools for the diagnosis of a rare form of congenital myopathy due to a TRIP4 intragenic deletion.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Early Findings in Neonatal Cases ofFrontiers in neurology · 2021
    Article
  16. Core myopathies - a short review.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Update on Congenital Myopathies in Adulthood.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gianina Ravenscroft1 Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Centre for Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Nigel G Laing1 Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Centre for Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Carsten G Bönnemann2 National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke/NIH, Porter Neuroscience Research Centre, Bethesda, MD, USA carsten.bonnemann@nih.gov.

Funding

Molecular and Clinical Manifestations of Matrix and Aggregate MyopathiesZIANS003129 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI BÖNNEMANN, CARSTEN · 2011 to 2025
$52.8M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The congenital myopathies are a diverse group of genetic skeletal muscle diseases, which typically present at birth or in early infancy. There are multiple modes of inheritance and degrees of severity (ranging from foetal akinesia, through lethality in the newborn period to milder early and later onset cases). Classically, the congenital myopathies are defined by skeletal muscle dysfunction and a non-dystrophic muscle biopsy with the presence of one or more characteristic histological features. However, mutations in multiple different genes can cause the same pathology and mutations in the same gene can cause multiple different pathologies. This is becoming ever more apparent now that, with the increasing use of next generation sequencing, a genetic diagnosis is achieved for a greater number of patients. Thus, considerable genetic and pathological overlap is emerging, blurring the classically established boundaries. At the same time, some of the pathophysiological concepts underlying the congenital myopathies are moving into sharper focus. Here we explore whether our emerging understanding of disease pathogenesis and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, rather than a strictly gene-centric approach, will provide grounds for a different and perhaps complementary grouping of the congenital myopathies, that at the same time could help instil the development of shared potential therapeutic approaches. Stemming from recent advances in the congenital myopathy field, five key pathophysiology themes have emerged: defects in (i) sarcolemmal and intracellular membrane remodelling and excitation-contraction coupling; (ii) mitochondrial distribution and function; (iii) myofibrillar force generation; (iv) atrophy; and (v) autophagy. Based on numerous emerging lines of evidence from recent studies in cell lines and patient tissues, mouse models and zebrafish highlighting these unifying pathophysiological themes, here we review the congenital myopathies in relation to these emerging pathophysiological concepts, highlighting both areas of overlap between established entities, as well as areas of distinction within single gene disorders.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsHumansInfant, NewbornMiceMyopathies, Structural, Congenitalatrophyautophagycongenital myopathyexcitation-contraction couplingforce generationmembrane remodellingmitochondriapathophysiologytriad

Identifiers

PMID25552303
PMCPMC4306824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.