Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25552239›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2015

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for infection stones: what is the risk for postoperative sepsis? A retrospective cohort study.

Ohad Shoshany, David Margel, Camil Finz, Orly Ben-Yehuda, Pinhas M Livne, Ronen Holand, David Lifshitz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Predicting the risk of sepsis and causative organisms following urinary stones removal using urinary versus stone and stent cultures.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ohad ShoshanyUrology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva and Sakler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, ohadsh10@gmail.com.
David Margel
Camil Finz
Orly Ben-Yehuda
Pinhas M Livne
Ronen Holand
David Lifshitz
Tel Aviv University · ILRabin Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative course of patients with positive stone culture (SC) to patients with sterile SC, and to analyze the predictors for post percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) sepsis; and to describe the type and resistance patterns of bacteria responsible for post PCNL sepsis. From a cohort of 206 consecutive patients undergoing PCNL, we identified 45 patients with a positive SC (group A) and compared them to patients with a sterile SC (group B). Association between different groups was assessed using Chi square, two-tailed Student's t test and Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Twenty-three patients had postoperative sepsis and regression analysis was performed to identify clinical variables associated with sepsis. Demographics, stone load and hospitalization time were similar in both groups. Postoperative sepsis developed in 31.1% of patients in group A compared to 5.9% in group B. In multivariate analysis, only positive SC was an independent risk factor for postoperative sepsis (OR 6.894, 95% CI 2.31-20.59, P = 0.001). All patients responded well to treatment with no septic complications. Enterococci were the prevalent organism (29.4%) in patients with a positive SC. Quinolone resistance was high in both gram negative and gram positive bacteria. Patients with an infected stone are at high risk to develop postoperative sepsis despite standard preoperative antibiotic preparation. SC is important to direct further treatment as almost half of patients with positive SC have a discordant or sterile urine culture. Determining the prevalent bacteria and resistance patterns in SC can aid the selection of empiric antibiotic therapy in high-risk patients.

Indexed as

Nephrostomy, PercutaneousAdultAgedFemaleHumansIsraelKidney CalculiMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSepsisUrinary Tract Infections

Identifiers

PMID25552239
OpenAlexW2142614281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.