Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25551569›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Oxidative DNA damage in kidneys and heart of hypertensive mice is prevented by blocking angiotensin II and aldosterone receptors.

Susanne Brand, Kerstin Amann, Philipp Mandel, Anna Zimnol, Nicole Schupp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. DNA damage and arterial hypertension. A systematic review and meta-analysis.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susanne BrandInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Kerstin AmannDepartment of Pathology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Philipp MandelInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Anna ZimnolInstitute of Toxicology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Nicole SchuppInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; Institute of Toxicology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRecently, we could show that angiotensin II, the reactive peptide of the blood pressure-regulating renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system, causes the formation of reactive oxygen species and DNA damage in kidneys and hearts of hypertensive mice. To further investigate on the one hand the mechanism of DNA damage caused by angiotensin II, and on the other hand possible intervention strategies against end-organ damage, the effects of substances interfering with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system on angiotensin II-induced genomic damage were studied.

methodsIn C57BL/6-mice, hypertension was induced by infusion of 600 ng/kg • min angiotensin II. The animals were additionally treated with the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker candesartan, the mineralocorticoid receptor blocker eplerenone and the antioxidant tempol. DNA damage and the activation of transcription factors were studied by immunohistochemistry and protein expression analysis.

resultsAdministration of angiotensin II led to a significant increase of blood pressure, decreased only by candesartan. In kidneys and hearts of angiotensin II-treated animals, significant oxidative stress could be detected (1.5-fold over control). The redox-sensitive transcription factors Nrf2 and NF-κB were activated in the kidney by angiotensin II-treatment (4- and 3-fold over control, respectively) and reduced by all interventions. In kidneys and hearts an increase of DNA damage (3- and 2-fold over control, respectively) and of DNA repair (3-fold over control) was found. These effects were ameliorated by all interventions in both organs. Consistently, candesartan and tempol were more effective than eplerenone.

conclusionAngiotensin II-induced DNA damage is caused by angiotensin II type 1 receptor-mediated formation of oxidative stress in vivo. The angiotensin II-mediated physiological increase of aldosterone adds to the DNA-damaging effects. Blocking angiotensin II and mineralocorticoid receptors therefore has beneficial effects on end-organ damage independent of blood pressure normalization.

Indexed as

8-Hydroxy-2'-DeoxyguanosineAldosteroneAngiotensin IIAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAnimalsAntioxidantsBenzimidazolesBiphenyl CompoundsBlood PressureCyclic N-OxidesDeoxyguanosineDNA DamageDNA RepairEnzyme ActivationEplerenoneGuanosine8-Hydroxy-2'-Deoxyguanosine8-hydroxyguanosineAldosteroneAngiotensin IIAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntioxidantsBenzimidazolesBiphenyl CompoundscandesartanCyclic N-OxidesDeoxyguanosineEplerenoneGuanosineMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsNfe2l2 protein, mouseNF-E2-Related Factor 2NF-kappa BReactive Oxygen SpeciesSpin LabelsSpironolactonetempolTetrazoles

Identifiers

PMID25551569
PMCPMC4297153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.